
2025 SCC Vol. 7 Part 3
2025 SCC Vol. 7 Part 3: Explore the latest Supreme Court Cases on Administrative Law, Constitution, Cooperative Societies, Negotiable Instruments Act, Food Adulteration, PMLA, and Transfer of Property.
2025 SCC Vol. 7 Part 3: Explore the latest Supreme Court Cases on Administrative Law, Constitution, Cooperative Societies, Negotiable Instruments Act, Food Adulteration, PMLA, and Transfer of Property.
“No provision under the 1908 Act confers power on any authority to refuse registration of a transfer document on the ground that the documents regarding the title of the vendor are not produced, or if his title is not established”.
“The evidence on the part of the appellants would reveal that instead of establishing ‘animus possidendi’ under hostile colour of title, they have tendered evidence indicating only permissive possession and at the same time failed to establish the time from which it was converted to adverse to the title of the respondent which is open and continuous for the prescriptive period.”
Relying on UN Krishnamurthy v. AM Krishnamurthy, the Court stated that the appellant failed to indicate willingness to perform their part of the transaction, as they neither showed nor proved the availability of sufficient funds required to make the payments per the contract
This report covers the Supreme Court’s Never Reported Judgment dating back to the year 1953 on Section 129 of the Transfer of Property Act,1882.
The Court noted that what is not expressly recognised in Shariat law is not necessarily something which is forbidden. It may still be in tune with the philosophy of the Quran.
“This report covers the Supreme Court's Never Reported Judgment dating back to the year 1951 on Transfer of Property Act, 1882.”
Allahabad High Court: In a writ petition filed against the order passed by the Collector under Section 98(1) of U.P.
Bombay High Court: In a unique case where the officers exercising powers under the Maharashtra Money Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014
Bombay High Court: A.S. Gadkari, J., while addressing a matter of the eviction of a tenant focused on the modes of serving
by Bhoumick Vaidya† and Harshini Kotecha††
Cite as: 2021 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 77
Kerala High Court: N. Anil Kumar, J., decided a matter wherein the son-in-law claimed his right on father-in-law’s property while pleading that
Punjab and Haryana High Court: Expressing that when the children, who the parents have reared with untold sorrows and miseries, throw them
by Simran Kaur Bhatia†
Supreme Court: The bench of Hemant Gupta and AS Bopanna, JJ has held that in order to determine whether a document is
by Achal Gupta†
Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Judge Bench of K.M. Joseph and Sharad Kumar Sharma, JJ., had allowed a revision which was filed
Kerala High Court: A. Muhamed Mustaque, J. dismissed a petition challenging the order of Appellate Authority under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents