V Senthil Balaji bail
Case BriefsSupreme Court

V. Senthil Balaji was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 14-06-2023 for an alleged offence under Section 3 of PMLA.

Judges remarks
Hot Off The PressNews

“Casual observation may indicate personal biases especially when perceived to be directed at a certain gender or community. One must be wary of making patriarchal or misogynistic comments”

NRI quota admissions
Hot Off The PressNews

Supreme Court called broadening the definition of NRI candidate a ‘money-spinning tactic’.

Arbitral Autonomy
Experts CornerVasanth Rajasekaran

by Vasanth Rajasekaran* and Harshvardhan Korada**

Discrimination among homogenous group
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“It will be improper to discriminate inter se among a homogenous group of students admitted for the academic session 2009-10. It could not be that those students admitted in the first round of counselling would be eligible, even with less than 50% marks in graduation, while the others admitted in the subsequent rounds of counselling would not be.”

judicial precedents and res judicata
Cases ReportedNever Reported Judgments

This report covers the Supreme Court’s Never Reported Judgment, on judicial precedents and res judicata, dating back to the year 1954.

petition without petitioner knowledge
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“There is a great sanctity attached to the proceedings conducted in the Court. No professional much less legal professional, is immune from being prosecuted for his/her criminal misdeeds.”

Competition Commission of India Jurisdiction
DSK LegalExperts Corner

by Danish Khan* and Aakrit Aditya Sharma**

Manipulated listing of cases
Hot Off The PressNews

Supreme Court suspected potential manipulation, indicating that someone might be purposely controlling the listing process.

Justice V Srishananda
Hot Off The PressNews

Justice Vedavyasachar Srishananda was appointed as Additional Judge of the Karnataka High Court and taken oath on 04-05-2020 and was made permanent judge on 25-09-2021.

Indian Oil Corporation
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court permitted the petitioners to initiate contempt proceedings in addition to any other remedy which may be available to him, in case of failure to comply with the given directions.

Bail in NDPS
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The Supreme Court overturned the Rajasthan High Court’s decision, wherein his bail application was dismissed.

bulldozer action
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“The said direction would not be applicable if there is an unauthorized structure in any public place and also to cases where there is an order for demolition made by a Court.”

Kolkata Rape and Murder case
Hot Off The PressNews

Supreme Court also asked the State Government to take necessary steps to ensure biometric facilities for controlling access to the duty rooms and rest rooms.

FSI Compensation
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“A duty is cast on the State to pay compensation to the land losers as otherwise there would be a breach of Article 300-A of the Constitution.”

2024 SCC Vol. 7 Part 3
Cases ReportedSCC Weekly

Constitution of India — Arts. 141 and 142 — What is binding — “Law declared by Supreme Court” — Doctrine of merger

common intention
Cases ReportedNever Reported Judgments

This report covers the Supreme Court’s Never Reported Judgment, on common intention, dating back to the year 1953.

Election petition against KH Hangshing
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court reiterated that the Election Petition should not be rejected at the very threshold where there is a “substantial compliance” of the provisions.

Section 29A of Arbitration Act
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“Section 29A intends to ensure the timely completion of arbitral proceedings while allowing Courts the flexibility to grant extensions when warranted. Prescribing a limitation period, unless clearly stated in words or necessary, should not be accepted. Bar by limitation has penal and fatal consequences.”

Qualified Privilege immunity self- incriminating statement by witness
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The Court further held that there cannot be an absolute embargo on the Trial Court to initiate process under Section 319 CrPC., merely because a person, who though appears to be complicit, has deposed as a witness.