NCLT
BSV Prakash’s tenure as Acting President of NCLT — Extended
Extension of tenure of BSV Prakash Kumar, Judicial Member, NCLT as Acting President — National Company Law Tribunal. The extension period has
COVID-19 | Lockdown | NCLAT extends period of limitation applicable to pending proceedings/ interim orders, and directs banks to extend periods of Fixed Deposits
Upon requests for urgent listing of cases having been made telephonically to Registrar of this Appellate Tribunal from various persons, who were
NCLAT | NCLT’s order of barring an auditor for 5 years on grounds of misusing his position, held –Unsustainable
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): The Bench comprising of Justice Jarat Kumar Jain (Judicial) and Balvinder Singh (Technical) and Dr Ashok
Judicial Member Bethala Shantha Vijaya Prakash Kumar appointed as Actg. President of NCLT
S.O. 72(E).— Consequent on the completion of the term of Office of Justice Shri M.M. Kumar as President, National Company Law Tribunal
Provisions of I&B Code must prevail over Section 434 of Companies Act if there is any inconsistency: SC
Supreme Court: A Bench comprising of R.F. Nariman and M.R. Shah, JJ. allowed an appeal filed against the order of Rajasthan High
Appeal filed under I&B Code by ‘suspended’ Board of Directors—held not maintainable: NCLAT
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A two-member bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya and Balvinder Singh, Member (Technical) restored the Corporate
Proceedings under Section 9 I&B Code quashed in absence of Demand Notice in terms of Section 8(1): NCLAT
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A two-member bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial) allowed
Every ‘interest’ on principal amount is not included in ‘debt’; application under Section 9 I&B Code rejected: NCLAT
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A two-member bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial),
Cyrus Investment’s plea of transfer of company petition against Tata Sons to Tribunal’s Delhi forum dismissed
National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi: Cyrus Investment, the petitioners filed an application under Rule 11, read with Rule 16 of the
Pending winding up petitions of companies which have not been served before High Court shall stand transferred to National Company Law Tribunal
Bombay High Court: In a case dealing with petitions pending admission before the High Court filed under the Companies Act, 1956 where