Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News
The respondents contended that there was a possibility of manipulation of the original relevant record relating to the tender of laying a separate drinking water pipeline in Bhagirathpura and sample reports of M.P. Pollution Control Board.
The Court remarked that the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution includes the right to clean drinking water, and these petitions fell within the ambit of a public health emergency enshrined under Article 21.
In the instant matter, the petitioner, a student with 100% hearing impairment, approached the Court raising grievance regarding lack of adequate assistance, particularly the non-availability of an interpreter and denial of home-based instruction.
Karnataka High Court: A Division Bench of Abhay S Oka, CJ and Aravind Kumar, J., extended the date for all interim directions