Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News
“While considering an application for condonation of delay, the party seeking such indulgence is required to place before the Court a cogent and satisfactory explanation covering the entire period of delay, preferably explaining the delay day-to-day or at least stage-wise.”
“The FIR in question was registered in 2007, but the cancellation report was prepared in 2007/2009 but the same has not been presented till the intervention of this Court.”
Explore latest cases reported in SCC’S High Court Cases (HCC) on matter related to Town Planning, Implementation of Slum Rehabilitation Scheme (SRS), Scheme of development and Licence requirement for private market, Eligibility to vote for selection of developer, Lapse of sanction and cancellation of allotment of DDA flat after reallocation
Explore the latest cases reported in SCC’s Income Tax Reports (ITR) Volume on Income tax deductions, Depreciations, Reassessment, Appeal and much more.
“The satisfaction of the authorities based on conduct must precede action for prevention based on subjective satisfaction.”
India has long hoped to become an arbitration hub and providing time bound mechanisms for resolving disputes will certainly be a feather in the cap. Introducing Section 29A by way of amendment is therefore intentioned to ensure that the disputes in arbitration are adjudicated in a time-bound manner.
The Delhi High Court held that the Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise cannot continue the proceedings for adjudication of the impugned show cause notice, after the lapse of thirteen years.
The Right of speedy trial is a fundamental right, and its violation causes prejudice even to the accused person
Supreme Court: In appeal against the judgment passed by the Karnataka High Court three-judge bench of Uday Umesh Lalit*, C.J.,
Madras High Court: In a habeas corpus petition filed calling for the records pertaining to the order of detention passed
Madras High Court: A writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of habeus corpus
Punjab and Haryana High Court: The Division Bench of Ajay Tewari and Pankaj Jain, JJ., contemplated the appeal where the interest on
Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Puneet Gupta, J. detention order quashed and non-application of mind by the detaining authority in the present
Kerala High Court: A Division Bench of C.T. Ravikumar and V.G. Arun, JJ. dismissed a petition seeking quashing of disciplinary proceedings on
Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench of Ramesh Ranganathan, CJ and N.S. Dhanik, J. entertained a writ petition which sought mandamus against
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission: Justice V.K. Jain (Presiding Member), allowed a consumer complaint seeking a refund of money paid to book
Patna High Court: The Division Bench of Amreshwar Pratap Sahi and Anjana Mishra, JJ. rejected a petition assailing the order delivered by
Central Information Commission: In a recent case before CIC, appellant pleaded that he had received the information after issue of notice of
Punjab and Haryana High Court: While deciding the case of detainment of imported goods of petitioner for the inordinate period by Directorate of