MPID Act
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Bhomesh Bellam*

electricity act public interest
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“The Electricity Act, 2003 envisions a structured and fair mechanism for open access while ensuring that market participants do not engage in practices detrimental to the larger consumer base”.

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Section 154(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003 gives exclusive jurisdiction to the Special Court to determine civil liability in electricity theft cases.”

Sudhaker Shukla
Interviews

Interviewed by Nitya Nandan Garg

Arbitrations in Power Sector
Experts CornerJSA Advocates & Solicitors

by Amit Kapur* and Akshat Jain**

2024 SCC Vol. 6 Part 3
Cases ReportedSCC Weekly

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Ss. 8 and 11 — Arbitrability of dispute — Determination of — Reference to arbitration for

Income Tax on Compulsory Acquisition
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Somesh Jain*

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Even assuming the recorded consumption to be lesser than the average computed consumption of electricity, it can at best raise a doubt against the respondent; it cannot act as a proof beyond reasonable doubt to hold that the respondent has dishonestly tampered with the meter.”

Allahabad High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Allahabad High Court clarified that if the decree of eviction is set aside, recalled, or stayed, the tenants may remain entitled to apply for connection in accordance with law.

2024 SCC Vol. 2 Part 4
Cases ReportedSCC Weekly

M.P. Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 (23 of 1956) — S. 132(6)(l) — Tax on advertisement: Law clarified on requisites for levy of

calcutta high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“A decision-maker is insisted on recording reason in support of his decision to ensure transparency in decision-making process. When any order is subject to appeal or amenable to judicial review, then such order must be reasoned and speaking order.”

2024 SCC Vol. 1 Part 2
Cases ReportedSCC Weekly

Reservation, Concession, Exemption, Relaxation and Affirmative Action — Caste/Tribe Certificate: Matters to be considered while determining whether cancellation of caste certification is

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

In Southern Electricity Supply Co. of Orissa Ltd. v. Sri Seetaram Rice Mill, (2012) 2 SCC 108, Supreme Court held that where a consumer has used excessive load as against the installed load simpliciter and there is violation of the terms and conditions of supply, then, the case would fall under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003.

ibc overrides electricity act
Case BriefsSupreme Court

In the case at hand, PVVNL had argued that the rights of electricity suppliers were not subordinate and subject to the ‘priority of claims’ mechanism under the IBC.

appellate tribunal for electricity
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

The Tribunal regarded the hike in violation of Section 61(d) of the Electricity Act, 2003 and against the larger public interest, which is one of the critical factors to be taken into consideration in deciding whether to grant interim relief.

section 5 of electricity act
Cases ReportedNever Reported Judgments

This report covers the Supreme Court’s Never Reported Judgment, dating back to the year 1950, on Section 5 of the Electricity Act, 1910.

electricity act
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The ruling came in a batch of cases where new owners of properties, purchased in auction sales, have been denied electricity connections due to the previous owners’ failure to pay their electricity dues.

2023 scc vol. 4 part 5
Cases ReportedSCC Weekly

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Or. 9 R. 13 r/w S. 17 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 — Ex

change in law
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court has requested the Union of India along with Ministry of Power to evolve a mechanism so as to ensure timely payment by the DISCOMS to the Generating Companies, which would avoid huge carrying cost to be passed over to the end consumers.

Allahabad High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Right of speedy trial is a fundamental right, and its violation causes prejudice even to the accused person