Civil Court barred to entertain matter which DRT is empowered to adjudicate under SARFAESI
Bombay High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of A.S. Chandurkar, J. allowed a civil revision application filed by the tenant —
DRT
‘Substitute’ has effect of deleting old law; Presiding Officers of DRT allowed to continue till age 65: SC
Supreme Court: The Bench of A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan, JJ. allowed a writ petition filed by Presiding Officers of the Debt
Section 17 of SARFAESI Act provides remedy before DRT against the order of District Magistrate
Madhya Pradesh High Court: In a matter arising under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest (SARFAESI) Act,
Tenants have a right to approach DRT under S. 17(4-A) of SARFAESI Act
Karnataka High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Vineet Kothari, J., decided a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227
Application under S. 17(1) SARFAESI Act is maintainable only after actual possession is taken by secured creditor
Allahabad High Court: A Full Bench comprising of Dilip B. Bhosale, CJ, and Devendra Kumar Arora and Vivek Chaudhary, JJ., sat to