tis hazari court
Case BriefsDistrict Court

If there is cogent evidence that the accused was shown to prosecution witnesses, refusal to participate in test identification parade by accused is justified and the said test identification parade cannot be used against the accused for any purpose. If identification in Test Identification Parade has taken place after the accused is shown to the witnesses, then not only is the evidence of Test Identification Parade inadmissible, even an identification in a court during trial is meaningless.

rouse avenue court, delhi
Case BriefsDistrict Court

The coal scam in Chhattisgarh was pertaining to the allocation of ‘Fatehpur East’ coal block in favour of JLD Yavatmal Energy Private Limited.

rouse avenue court, delhi
Hot Off The PressNews

“BJP MP and former Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh has been granted interim bail by Delhi’s Rouse Avenue Court in the case of alleged sexual harassment of six female wrestlers. His secretary Vinod Tomar is also granted bail by the Delhi Court.”

rouse avenue court, delhi
Case BriefsDistrict Court

Delhi Court observed that it is crucial for Delhi Commission for Women to focus on substantive actions rather than superficial gestures just for the sake of publicity and bringing the name in newspaper or to find fault in the other institution when equal responsibility lies with them also.

saket court, new delhi
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi Court observed that as per the series of events, the accused was made a scapegoat in case things did not work out as planned.

Patiala House Courts
Case BriefsDistrict Court

Unilateral Appointment of the Sole Arbitrator vitiates the proceedings of Arbitration.

Patiala House Courts, Delhi
Case BriefsDistrict Court

    Patiala House Court (New Delhi): In a bail application plea under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973

Rouse Avenue
Case BriefsDistrict Court

    Rouse Avenue District Courts, Delhi: In a case filed by Central Bureau of Investigation questioning the power of investigating agency

Tis Hazari Court
Case BriefsDistrict Court

“Questioning the honesty of a person is the worst form of accusation and the same can have a serious detrimental effect on the reputation of a person. It would harm the reputation of any person, and especially an advocate, in the estimation of the right-thinking members of society. There is no doubt that such a statement is per se defamatory.”

Tis Hazari Court
Case BriefsDistrict Court

    West, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi: In a case wherein it is alleged that the accused committed the offence punishable under

Case BriefsDistrict Court

    Karkardooma Court, Delhi: In a bail application moved on behalf of applicant/accused Saleem Malik @ Munna under Section 437 Code

Case BriefsDistrict Court

While determining whether there is infringement of trademark, one is not required to see dissimilarity, but one is required to see similarity and there is similarity of all words except one word, in the present case.

Case BriefsDistrict Court

    Saket Court, Delhi: In an application filed seeking bail for Sharjeel Imam, (‘bail-applicant’) who is a JNU student alleged for

Rouse Avenue
Case BriefsDistrict Court

    Rouse Avenue Courts Complex, Delhi: In a case filed by Enforcement Directorate (‘petitioner') seeking transfer of the case titled ‘Directorate

Rouse Avenue
Case BriefsDistrict Court

Rouse Avenue District Court, Delhi: In a case filed by the counsel for accused ‘KT Jaleel’ alleging wrong reporting in various daily

Case BriefsDistrict Court

Karkardooma Court, Delhi: In a case filed by the State against the two accused Yogender Singh and Suraj under Section 147/148/149/427/436 Penal

Rouse Avenue
Case BriefsDistrict Court

Rouse Avenue Court, New Delhi: While granting bail to the applicant Pramond Kumar Bhasin, Ajay Gulati, J. observed that the charge sheet

Tis-hazari
Case BriefsDistrict Court

Tis Hazari Court, Delhi: While deciding a bail application, Kamini Lau, J. granted anticipatory in a case where the complainant-girl was a

Case BriefsDistrict Court

Delhi Court: Vinod Yadav, J., held that Umar Khalid cannot be permitted to remain behind bars in the present case on the