2026 SCC Vol. 3 Part 1: Key Supreme Court Cases on Arbitration, Contract, & Customs
Explore the latest Supreme Court Cases in 2026 SCC Vol. 3 Part 1 on challenge to execution of award, breach of contract, and customs duty on electrical energy.
Explore the latest Supreme Court Cases in 2026 SCC Vol. 3 Part 1 on challenge to execution of award, breach of contract, and customs duty on electrical energy.
“In commercial transactions, especially in the travel industry, group bookings for festive periods are made precisely to capitalize on predictable seasonal demand.”
A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week.
“The breach continued only during the period of the contract and not upon its expiry. The Court observed that the breach was continuous, but only during the subsistence of the contract. Once the contractual period fixed by the parties had expired, the breach could no longer be considered ongoing.”
“The essence of the IBC lies in resolving insolvency matters through a process driven approach, and any deviation from its prescribed scope would undermine the legislative intent of the Code.”
Once petitioner-Mukand Poly Products expressed its inability to supply pipes with 82.36% Local Content and that it will cater the supplies pursuant to the procurement order with its product having 51.45% Local Content, it will amount to abandoning the contract.
This report covers the Supreme Court’s Never Reported Judgment dating back to the year 1953 on damages for breach of contract.
X Corp had alleged that CCDH created faulty narratives about X (formerly Twitter) being overwhelmed by hateful content, thereby harming its business by driving advertisers away from the platform
by Vasanth Rajasekaran* and Harshvardhan Korada**
Cite as: 2024 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 22
This report covers the Supreme Court's Never Reported Judgment dating back to the year 1951 on breach of contract.
The impugned arbitral award was passed without considering the clauses of the Concessionaire Agreement while adjudicating on the rate of interest to be granted, thus, suffers from infirmity and patent illegality.
Google LLC’s download warning in respect of all third-party applications was a mere disclaimer and there was no case made out for trade mark infringement.
Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS): In a 6-3 ruling, Court expressed that, Emotional distress damages are not recoverable in a
112 significant Reports from 22 High Courts Allahabad High Court Right to Reputation People using cyberspace to vent out anger and
Supreme Court: Explaining the law on abandonment on contractual obligation, the bench of Hemant Gupta and V. Ramasubramanian*, JJ has held that
Calcutta High Court: The Division Bench of Soumen Sen and Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, JJ., dismissed an appeal concerned with a breach of
United States District Court, North District of California: While issuing a permanent injunction, stating Apple could no longer prohibit developers linking to
by Hasit B. Seth†
Cite as: 2021 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 12
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL): A Coram of Manjula Chellur, J. (Chairperson) and S.D. Dubey (Technical Member), allowed an appeal which was
Supreme Court of Canada: Full Bench comprising Wagner, C.J., Abella, Moldaver, Karakatsanis, Côté, Brown, Rowe, Martin and Kasirer, JJ. allowed an appeal against