Manipur HC | Remedy under Article 226 not allowed where matter involves disputed question of facts
Manipur High Court: The Bench of Ramalingam Sudhakar, J. dismissed a writ petition holding that proper remedy for the petitioners to seek intervention
Article 226
Relief sought against a Registered Society| A matter of civil dispute cannot be adjudicated by way of Article 226
Uttaranchal High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Manoj K. Tiwari, J. dismissed a writ petition on account of it being
Power of the State to lay down criteria for determination of linguistic minority, not arbitrary: Karnataka HC
Karnataka High Court: A Division Bench comprising of H.G.Ramesh and Mohammad Nawaz JJ., decided on a Writ Petition filed under Article 226
Exercise of establishing facts before the civil courts cannot be bypassed by invoking writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution
Karnataka High Court: While passing the order in a writ petition filed under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution, a Single
No regularisation can be claimed if service-span is less than three years
Delhi High Court: In a writ petition under Article 226 before the Delhi High Court, the petitioner sought the relief of continuation as
Websites can’t be restrained from publishing non-reportable judgments
Gujarat High Court:A petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution praying to obtain a suitable writ for restraining the free public
Writ Petition under Article 226 not maintainable if lower forums or authorities have not been approached first
Karnataka High Court: In the petition dealing with relief sought against some public bodies and private parties in Bengaluru under Articles 226
High Courts’ power of judicial review under Article 226 invoked only when there is breach of law or violation of the Constitution
Supreme Court: In an appeal filed by the Union Government against a judgment of the Rajasthan High Court which issued a direction