Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of RF Nariman, BR Gavai and Hrishikesh Roy, JJ has held that given the object of speedy

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Shaurya Sahay†

Case BriefsSupreme Court

3 years is an unduly long period for filing an application under Section 11, since it would defeat the very object of the Act, which provides for expeditious resolution of commercial disputes within a time bound period.

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: In the light of the “prima facie” test laid down last year in Vidya Drolia v. Durga Trading Corporation, (2021) 2

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Sushmita Gandhi*,  Anamika Singh** &  Bhargav Kosuru***

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Payal Chandra* & Rhythm Buaria**

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Yakshay M. Chheda* & Ishan  J. Ravindranath**

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Vatsala Pant*

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Alabh Anant Lal* & Soham Banerjee**

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Byron Sequeira* & Dhruv Srivastava**

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: A Bench comprising of Uday U. Lalit and Ashok Bhushan, JJ. dismissed a review petition filed against Supreme Court’s judgment dated

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Uttaranchal High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Manoj K. Tiwari, J., dismissed a bunch of writ petitions filed against the

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Uttaranchal High Court: An application for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, was dismissed

Op EdsOP. ED.

by M. Rishi Kumar Dugar*

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Gita Mittal, Actg. CJ and C. Hari Shankar, J., disposed of an appeal under

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Karnataka High Court: While deciding a civil petition under Section 11(6) and (8) read with Section 15(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Madhya Pradesh High Court: In three separate writ petitions, the termination of the mandate of the Arbitrator and the appointment of a

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: The Court elaborated on Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 while dismissing an appeal

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Karnataka High Court: While passing the order in a civil miscellaneous petition filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: Petitioners appeared before the Delhi High Court under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to challenge the