Judicial Intervention under Section 11 Arbitration
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Kriti Shree*

Punjab Kings Ownership dispute
Case BriefsHigh Courts

A dispute arose between Karan Paul and K.P.H. Dream Cricket Pvt. Ltd. Owner of IPL franchise Punjab Kings which was to be decided by the Sole Arbitrator as per the Company’s Articles of Association.

Avtar Singh’s Law of Arbitration and Conciliation
Book ReviewNews

The 13th Edition of Avtar Singh’s Law of Arbitration and Conciliation is set to release soon, incorporating recent legislative developments, landmark judicial pronouncements, and evolving arbitral practice in India.

res judicata bars re-litigation
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Since disputes had already been subjected to arbitration and culminated in the Arbitral Award, the disputes and differences, including differences over interest payment prior to commencement of arbitration, are issues that are covered by constructive res judicata.”

Arbitral Tribunal cannot lift corporate veil
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Arbitrator went wrong in applying the doctrine of lifting the corporate veil/ determining another entity as the alter ego and fastening the liability on the petitioner.”

Disputes after settlement agreement arbitrable
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Execution of a full and final settlement may not preclude a party from taking recourse to arbitration if a dispute arises from the settlement itself”

Parties cannot challenge agreed interest rate
Case BriefsSupreme Court

BPL Ltd., having knowingly entered into the bill discounting agreement, was bound by its terms. Since it defaulted on repayment for years, the stipulated 36% compound interest could not be considered burdensome or oppressive.

insurance policy with arbitration clause
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The respondent submitted that no arbitration clause existed in light of the IRDAI Circular dated 27-10-2023 and Gazette Notification dated 23-1-2024, which had de-notified and superseded arbitration clauses in fire insurance policies.

unilateral appointment of sole arbitrator
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“At best, the letter consenting to appointment of sole arbitrator, was a conditional acceptance of the appointment of a sole arbitrator. The condition being that the sole arbitrator would adjudicate the disputes between the petitioner and both the respondents.”

Order under Section 25(a) of A&C Act
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Such an order merely terminates the arbitral proceedings on account of the claimant’s default in filing the statement of claim and does not involve any adjudication or determination of the rights or obligations of the parties.”

Sections 33 and 34 Arbitration Act
Experts CornerNumen Law Offices

by Arush Khanna* and Gurdev Singh Tung**

Appellate power under Section 37
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The scope of the intervention of the court in arbitral matters is virtually prohibited, if not absolutely barred.”

Arbitrator's Power to Award Interest
Experts CornerLakshmikumaran & Sridharan

by Dinesh Babu Eedi*, Parth Agrawal** and CL Minati***

SEPCO
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“When a party is unable to analyse, comment or argue on a contention raised by the other party, it will certainly be deemed as a breach of natural justice and thereby, also a violation of the most fundamental notions of justice.”

Consent in Arbitration Agreement
Experts CornerVasanth Rajasekaran

by Vasanth Rajasekaran* and Harshvardhan Korada**

Experts CornerNumen Law Offices

by Manasi Chaudhari*

Indian Arbitration
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Saksham Mishra* and Kartikey Agrawal**

Embracing AI in Arbitration
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Bhavana Chandak Dhoundiyal* and Shambhavi Upadhyay**

Writ Jurisdiction in Arbitration
Experts CornerNumen Law Offices

by Arush Khanna* and Akarsh Pandey**

Premature Termination of Arbitration
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Avineet Chawla* and Piyush Raj**