withdrawal of charge sheet does not disrupt service
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Because of the order restoring status-quo ante as operating prior to 18 December 2010, the petitioner continued to be an employee of Memon Co-operative Bank Ltd. and was entitled to all the benefits which were available to other employees who were absorbed by Bank of Baroda on amalgamation.”

Rajasthan High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Rajasthan High Court held that contractual engagement does not confer a vested right of employment to workers engaged through placement agencies.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Delhi High Court upheld the order of the Labour Court wherein it was held that since the messenger boy of a Bank was unable to establish that he moved an application for absorption in the service in pursuance of the Bipartite Settlement, therefore, he was not entitled to regularisation of service. Further, the Dehi High Court held that regularisation was not a matter of right and therefore, this Court could not direct the respondent Bank to regularize the services of the messenger boy.

Legal RoundUpSCC Times NewsflashWATCH NOW

TOP STORY OF THE WEEK Anganwadi Workers/Helpers entitled to payment of gratuity; ‘Time to take serious note of their plight’  In a

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme court: In a long ongoing battle between Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) and its temporary/badli/part-time employees over claim for absorption,

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: In the case where the Gujarat High Court had ordered the absorption of persons employed in a temporary unit, by