HIGH COURT JANUARY 2024 WEEKLY ROUNDUP| Stories on Pepsico Potato chips battle; Right of convict to procreate; Manual scavengers; and more
A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week.
A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week.
by Dinesh Eedi* and Jyotshna Yashaswi**
Cite as: 2024 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 6
Madras High Court said that natural justice clearly requires that the additional evidence placed on record by both parties should be considered by the Opposition Board.
A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week.
The petition was filed by an Advocate, challenging the appointment of Public Prosecutors / Additional Public Prosecutors in all District Courts within the territorial Jurisdiction of Madurai Bench.
“Under the Islamic Law, the husband is entitled for Polygamous marriage, however, he has to treat all the wives equally”
The Court modified the sentence imposed and found the convicts guilty under Sections 323 and 324 of the IPC.
Organized by School of Excellence in Law, The Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University in Association with Subbaraya Aiyar, Padmanabhan and Ramamani
“The monopoly claim is not in respect of a business method but in respect of a claimed invention deploying hardware, software and firmware for purposes of data privacy and protection”
Madras High Court directed the Controller of Patents and Designs to decide the patent application on merits and in accordance with law.
After perusing Rule 154(2) of the Rules of 2002, Madras High Court said that it is manifested that the Appellate Authority has to be one who is immediately superior to the District Authority. The Transport Commissioner is not superior to the District Authority.
A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week.
While drawing the conclusion that the application does not fulfil the requirements of Section 16, the respondent has merely referred to the objections raised in the hearing notice.
Madras High Court said that the lids were identical as the design was one and the same and added that the Prestige was in the market of manufacturing pressure cookers for a long time and their trade mark is well known and their turnover was huge
A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week.
Madras High Court said that the appellants have given complete specifications which also capture the results of the evaluation of the claimed invention against the parameters of penetration, nutrient permeability and root penetration test.
“Be it in infringement or passing off actions, or in the context of an application for registration and objections being raised on relative grounds – the visual, phonetic and structural similarity between the later and earlier marks will, as in all cases, play a significant role.”
The relationship between the government and the Law Officer is purely a professional relationship and not that of a master and servant
Madras High Court said that in respect of the motorcycle industry, the trade mark ‘Royal Enfield’ is well-known, not only in India, but also in abroad. Their annual reports also prove that their turnover runs into several hundreds of crores of rupees and they have carved a niche for themselves in the motorcycle industry.
Madras High Court said that the grant of community certificate or cancellation of community certificate would have a larger repercussion and will affect the future generation of the family