Claim for Refund of Advance: Whether an Operational Debt
by Rahul Poddar*
Operational Creditor
NCLAT | Insolvency process proceeded without ‘Demand Notice’ being served under S. 8 IBC due to change in ‘registered address’. Does Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code allow to proceed in such circumstances? Read on
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): The Division Bench of Venugopal M (Judicial Member) and Alok Srivastava (Technical Member) held that a
NCLAT rejects Corporate Creditor’s demand of payment of outstanding operational debt worth Rs 58 crores, after finding ‘plausible contention’ in debtor’s arguments
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi: The 3-Member Bench of Justice Bansi Lal Bhat (Acting Chairperson), V.P. Singh, Member (Technical) and
NCLAT | Rejection of application under S. 9 IBC upheld where CIRP initiated with ‘fraudulent and malicious’ intent
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A Bench of S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice A.I.S Cheema, Member (Judicial) and Kanthi Narahari, Member
Trade Union is an operational creditor under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
Supreme Court: Holding that the trade union represents its members who are workers, to whom dues may be owed by the employer,
NCLAT | A shareholder can save corporate debtor from insolvency by paying creditor’s dues before constitution of CoC even if S. 9 application has been admitted
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A Bench of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice A.I.S Cheema, Member (Judicial) and Kanthi Narahari,