likelihood of confusion Archives

Duration of confusion in customer’s mind not material, even momentary confusion sufficient to establish trade mark infringement: Delhi HC

“The fact that the customer may on a closer examination of products and enquiries find that the impugned trade marks are not associated with the appellant’s trade marks would not take away from the fact that the impugned marks bear a similarity with the appellants trade mark, which led to the confusion.”

Case Briefs High Courts

‘INDIAN STAG’ deceptively similar to ‘ROYAL STAG’, but no case of passing off made out in favour of Pernod Ricard India: Delhi High Court

“In view of pictorial depiction of stag, the “STAG” part of plaintiff’s mark has necessarily to be held to be its essential and dominating feature and the use, by defendant, of word STAG along with pictorial depiction of stag, clearly indicates imitation, by defendant, of essential features of plaintiff’s mark.”