Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News
‘In the present case, the victim and his family had suffered at the hands of an insensitive and callous administration and had to approach the Constitutional Courts four times for the redressal of his grievances.’
The formation of opinion under Section 20(2) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 is in the exercise of supervisory powers of Central Information Commission and not in the exercise of the adjudicatory powers.
“There is not even a single scrap of a document placed on record by the appellant/society to show any kind of legitimacy it exercises, either over the land or the illegal structure built thereon.”
The Court was of the view that, as a disciplinary panel is already constituted for considering the case of the appellant, it will not be appropriate for the Court to interdict the proceedings at this stage.
The Court stated that JJ Basti/cluster in question was not a notified JJ Basti as per DUSIB list of 675 Notified JJ Basti’s in Delhi, which further clarifies that the residents of the appellant-union are living illegally
The Delhi High Court took judicial notice of the fact that Dalai Lama had already expressed his apology to those who may have been offended by his action.
The Delhi High Court said that the directions sought were not only beyond but also contrary to the law laid down by the Supreme Court.
The Delhi High Court reiterated that in cases of wrongful termination of service, reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages is normal rule.