Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Special Public Prosecutor submitted that there are 194 intercepted calls, revealing incriminating conversation involving the petitioner in negotiations and distribution of illegal gains. Thus, a larger conspiracy is to be unearthed, for which the custodial interrogation is needed.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court observed that accused prima facie seems to be involved in organized narcotic network and has been frequently in touch with the main supplier of the contraband and with the receiver of the contraband.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court stated that though it may be true that the petitioner cannot be present at the same time on the entire stretch of 3 kms, but, the criminals having carried out activities at 12 places without being noticed by the petitioner, clearly shows that he is not diligent in the performance of his duty and it is a case of gross dereliction thereof.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court directed for the CRPF personnel to be considered as having proceeded on voluntary retirement w.e.f. 30-06-2021.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

‘Being careful while giving reasons to candidates for which they have not been appointed would help in avoiding such litigation which entails cost for candidates who may not be able to afford it.’

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

‘The Medical Board Proceedings acknowledged that the posting of the army personnel involved severe/exceptional stress and strain’

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

‘The Standing Order issued by the Director General, CRPF makes it evident that medical category SHAPE-I is an essential condition for promotion of all combatised personnel in all groups, ranks, and cadres in the Central Armed Police Forces.’

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court hoped that the Union would look into suitably amending the nomenclature of posts that are open to both males and females to make them gender-neutral.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court stated that the impugned order was entirely against the compliance of provision under Order XI Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and spirit of Commercial Courts Act, 2015, thus, the documents brought on record were directed to be taken off the record.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court stated that certificate under Section 65-B of the IEA was a matter of procedure and by not allowing the same to be taken on record amounts to taking a hyper technical view which was against the settled preposition of law.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court noted that the respondent merely seeks to summon the record, which was not in his possession but was in the possession of the petitioner, which right cannot be denied to him.