Premion LLC
Law Firms NewsNews

(LKS) advised Premion LLC, an industry leading connected TV (CTV)/Over-the-Top (OTT) advertising platform, for acquisition of Octillion Media India Private Limited.

nykaa oykaa mark
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The mark, the name, and the overall look and feel of the website gave a clear impression that defendants are making a deliberate attempt to imitate and copy plaintiffs name/mark ‘NYKAA’ only to gain monetarily by such deception.”

ADVICE
Law Firms NewsNews

Lakshmikumaran and Sridharan attorneys (LKS) acted as legal advisors to ETS in acquiring People Strong’s assessment and remote proctoring business Wheebox. LKS

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

A court-monitored investigation is a significant measure, typically invoked when there is a palpable sense of governmental neglect or oversight. It is not a mechanism to be employed routinely or without just cause.

AMRI Hospitals Limited
Law Firms NewsNews

DEAL DETAILS Manipal Health Enterprises Private Limited | Acquisition of controlling interest in AMRI Hospitals Limited Khaitan & Co advised Manipal Health

corporate and m&a practice
Law Firms NewsNews

New Delhi, 04 July 2023: Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan (L&S), one of India’s leading full-service law firms, recently onboarded two new Partners, Ms.

Law Firms NewsNews

Mumbai, 4 April 2023: Khaitan & Co, a leading full-service law firm has announced the appointment of Rakki Partani and Promode Murugavelu

Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Bombay High Court observed that confusion in the case a medicinal or pharmaceutical product may have disastrous effect on the health.

Lakshmikumaran and Sridharan advised Divo TV Private Limited and the promoters to sign a deal to sell stake to Warner Music India Private Limited
Law Firms NewsNews

Lakshmikumaran and Sridharan acted as the legal counsel to Divo TV Private Limited (“Divo TV”) and its promoters and assisted them in

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Observing that performance of functions identical to those performed by medical practitioners by persons who do not possess the qualifications prescribed under the Central Act, could have dangerous consequences, the Supreme Court held that Rural Health Practitioners enlisted under the Assam Act, are underqualified to perform functions similar to those performed by medical practitioners registered in accordance with the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956. The Court, however, upheld the constitutionality of the Assam Community Professional (Registration and Competency) Act, 2015 that was enacted to give continuity in service to the practitioners in question.

Law School NewsOthers

NATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF LAWS IN INDIA Centre for Comparative Constitutional Law and Administrative Law (CCAL) National Law University

School of Law
Law School NewsMoot Court Announcements

The 13th Edition of National Moot Court Competition, of School of Law, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), is being conducted offline this

Meghalaya High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Meghalaya High Court : The Division Bench of Sanjib Banerjee, CJ. and W. Diengdoh, J. took cognizance of a petition in relation

Experts CornerMurali Neelakantan

by Murali Neelakantan† and Ashish Kulkarni††
Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 31

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Shantanu Mukherjee† and Vatsala Sood††

Case BriefsSupreme Court

“It may not be feasible to require the majority of our population to rely on friends/NGOs for digital registrations over CoWIN, when even the digitally literate are finding it hard to procure vaccination slots.”

Case BriefsSupreme Court

“In grappling with the second wave of the pandemic, this Court does not intend to second-guess the wisdom of the executive when it chooses between two competing and efficacious policy measures. However, it continues to exercise jurisdiction to determine if the chosen policy measure conforms to the standards of reasonableness, militates against manifest arbitrariness and protects the right to life of all persons.”

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: The Division Bench of Vipin Sanghi and Jasmeet Singh, JJ., dealt with a petition which prayed for waiver of

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Gauhati High Court: The Division Bench of Sudhanshu Dhulia, CJ., and Manash Ranjan Pathak, J., addressed the issues relating to situation under

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Bombay High Court: The Division Bench of Ravindra V. Ghuge and B. U. Debadwar, JJ., addressed the issue of dysfunctional ventilators supplied