2025 SCC Vol. 8 Part 5
2025 SCC Vol. 8 Part 5: Explore the latest Supreme Court Cases on Constitution, Electricity, Service Law, Transfer of Property, and Consumer Protection.
2025 SCC Vol. 8 Part 5: Explore the latest Supreme Court Cases on Constitution, Electricity, Service Law, Transfer of Property, and Consumer Protection.
“It was arguable that an educated person had executed a document which was registered and then claimed ignorance of the nature of the transfer, which could not be fathomed.”
Supreme Court reiterated that it is a social obligation for both sons and daughters to maintain their parents when they are unable to do so.
The proceedings under S. 33 of Stamp Act will be initiated and not under S. 47-A if gift deed requires for payment of stamp duty.
Madras High Court has observed that by entering such a relationship, the appellant has committed an intentional tort, namely interference in the marital relationship with intentionally alienating him from his wife and children
The Delhi High Court said that this case is demonstrative of how S. 15(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 works against a woman.
“A Mother executing gift of her residential bungalow in favour of her son is bound to expect that the son would let her reside in that bungalow.”
“When a senior citizen parts with his or her property by executing a gift or a release or otherwise in favour of his or her near and dear ones, a condition of looking after the senior citizen is not necessarily attached to it.”
“…with globalization and with all modern technology we find drastic change in socio economic conditions and Indian values being eroded with adoption of the western culture and western tradition.”
Supreme Court: In a case where a portion of a joint Hindu Family was alienated ‘out of love and affection’ by way
Bombay High Court: The Division Bench of V.M. Deshpande and Amit Borkar, JJ., expressed that a transaction by a natural guardian of
“If clever drafting of the plaint has created the illusion of a cause of action, the court will nip it in the bud at the earliest so that bogus litigation will end at the earlier stage.”
Supreme Court: In an issue relating to the alleged gift deed by an old illiterate woman, the bench of MR Shah and
Kerala High Court: N. Anil Kumar, J., decided a matter wherein the son-in-law claimed his right on father-in-law’s property while pleading that
Bombay High Court: A.K. Menon, J., addressed a matter wherein an arrangement was executed between the parties for taking care of the
Patna High Court: Mohit Kumar Shah, J., while addressing the instant partition suit decided on the question as to whether: transferee pendente
Calcutta High Court: Bibek Chaudhuri J. allowed an appeal challenging the judgment whereby a gift deed was held as void and donee
Supreme Court: The Bench comprising of Arun Mishra and Indira Banerjee, JJ. allowed an appeal while setting aside the judgment and order