Bodies of Control: Handcuffing and the Return of the Carceral State under BNSS
by Sandhyashree Karanth*
DueProcess
“Pankaj Bansal v. Union of India” – The Prospective-Retrospective Conundrum
by Prabhav Ralli* and Samraat Saxena**
Can Section 91 CrPC be invoked to compel an accused to produce incriminating material? Calcutta High Court examines
The Court observed that issuance of summons to produce a document against a person asking him to produce a document does not ipso facto makes the said person as a witness however, it would be highly unjust if the word ‘person’ used in Section 91 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is presumed to include an accused.
Delhi High Court analyses the precise definition of the word “forthwith” in Section 50 CrPC; Sets aside arrest due to non-compliance
Sufficient time must be given to an arrestee after the grounds of arrest have been served upon him in writing, to enable the arrestee to engage and confer with legal counsel, the test being that the arrestee must have meaningful opportunity to resist his remand to police custody or judicial custody.