Lexis Nexis Labour Court of South Africa
Case BriefsForeign Courts

The Court held that Lexis Nexis’ decision to deny the applicant the job of Senior Data Discovery and Enrichment Expert I, on the sole basis of his criminal history, constituted unfair discrimination.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Plagiarism by any stretch of imagination will remain plagiarism, irrespective of where the material had been copied from and the quantum of such material copied, will not have any bearing or impact on the alleged misconduct of plagiarism itself.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Section 115 of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 raises a statutory presumption that any person who attempts to commit suicide shall be presumed to have severe stress and shall not be tried and punished under the Penal Code, 1860.”

calcutta high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Any misconduct on the part of the bank employee/ officer can be meted out with disciplinary action in accordance with the service rules and regulations.”

scientist dismissed from isro
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The Court observed that not the unauthorised absence but the unauthorised association with foreign institution was a matter of concern for the security of the State.

Meghalaya High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court said that no proper show cause notice was served to the petitioner, violating the principle of audi alteram partem, thus, the dismissal from service was not in fair play.

Case BriefsSupreme Court

The Court was deciding the case where the ex-employees of Maharashtra State Financial Corporation had challenged decision denying the benefit of revision of pay scales, as recommended by the Fifth Pay Commission, to the employees who had retired or died during the period of 01.01.2006 to 29.03.2010.

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: In a case where an employee had produced a fake certificate for seeking employment, the bench of MR Shah* and

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Madhya Pradesh High Court: This petition was filed before the Bench of Prakash Shrivastava, J., under Article 226 of the Constitution where

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Rekha Palli and Siddhartha Mridul, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed against the order of

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: Kurian Joseph, J. delivered the judgment for himself and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J. wherein it was held that forfeiture of

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Madhya Pradesh High Court: The Court dismissed the petition seeking to overturn the order ousting the Petitioner’s husband (deceased) on the grounds