Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News
Since the first round of counselling had already been finalized, the Court directed that the students/candidates who had already taken admission pursuant to the first round of counselling shall not be disturbed, for further counselling, CLAT Consortium shall act on the revised/re-notified merit list.
“A person who indulges in facilitating leakage of question paper relating to competitive examinations, plays with the career and future of lakhs of young aspirants, who are ‘burning the midnight oil’ to prepare for competitive exams. Such an act is more heinous than an offence of murder because by killing a person, only one family gets affected but by ruining the career of lakhs of aspirants whole society is adversely impacted.”
Supreme Court: In the case where a candidate appearing for examination for recruitment to the post of Constables in Railway Protection Force
Inerviewed by Nisha Gupta
Delhi High Court: While deciding a writ petition by a student who was not permitted to appear for a competitive exam because
Supreme Court: In a detailed judgment, the bench of Dr. DY Chandrachud and AS Bopanna, JJ has upheld the Constitutional validity of
“Judicial review of a policy decision and to issue mandamus to frame policy in a particular manner are absolutely different.”
“What is being claimed and prayed for under the guise of Covid 19 pandemic is nothing but a lame excuse in taking additional attempt to participate in the Civil Service Examination 2021 to be held in future.”