Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News
Delhi High Court: In a case filed questioning whether the cumulative sum of Rs. 1,80,10,000/- deposited on behalf of the
The 48th GST Council has made recommendations relating to changes in GST tax rates, measures for facilitation of trade and
It suffered from non-application of mind and was in violation of mandatory requirement of section 75 (6) of the CGST Act.
The Authority said that as the applicant entered into agreements with TSIICL for execution of contracts of buildings, warehouses, godowns , and TSIICL in turn let out the godowns for its customers on rent which amounts to use of the constructed premises for the purpose of business, thus, tax will be applicable at the rate of 9 percent CGST and SGST each.
Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (Maharashtra): In an appeal filed under Section 100 of the Central Goods and Services Tax
Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling: The two-member bench Milind Kavatkar and Amit Kumar Mishra has ruled that Goods and Service
Delhi High Court: In a case filed by Loreal India Private Limited (petitioner) challenging the order dated 23-06-2022 passed by
Telangana High Court: While allowing the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for quashing the
Tamil Nadu Authority for Advance Ruling: T.G. Venkatesh, Additional Commissioner, and K. Latha, Joint Commissioner held that concerning vessel support services provided
Madras High Court: Anita Sumanth, J. set aside the impugned order which rejected a registration application filed under Section 22
Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Punjab: Arun Narayan Gupta Chief Commissioner, CGST Commissionerate, and Kamal Kishor Yadav, Commissioner of State
Ahmedabad Authority for Advance Ruling: Members Atul Mehta and Arun Richard, has held that 18% GST is payable on value for intended
Maharashtra Authority for Advance Ruling: Rajiv Mangoo, Additional Commissioner of Central Tax & T.R. Ramani, Joint Commissioner of State Tax held that
Rajasthan High Court: Narendra Singh Dhaddha rejected bail and dismissed the petition being devoid of merits. The present bail application has been
Punjab and Haryana High Court: The Division Bench of Ajay Tewari and Pankaj Jain, JJ., contemplated the appeal where the interest on
Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Akil Kureshi CJ and Sudesh Bansal J ranted interim relief and stayed the provisional attachment
“When the undeniable facts, including the traffic blockage due to agitation, are taken into consideration, the State alone remains responsible for not providing smooth passage of traffic.”
Karnataka High Court: S. Sunil Dutt Yadav J. disposed off the petition and reinstated an observation “If any money is due to
Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling, GST: Addressing the matter with regard to purchase of scrap/used vehicles by composition dealer from unregistered dealer,