Supreme Court dismisses Centre’s plea on Retrospective Honorarium to Law Researchers
“The question of law is kept open to be decided in an appropriate case.”
article 136
Decision rendered by Apex Court, at SLP stage or post grant of leave cannot be assailed directly or collaterally under Article 32: Supreme Court affirms
“Finality of a lis is a core facet of a sound judicial system. Litigation which had concluded or had reached finality cannot be reopened. If this is permitted, then there will be no finality and no end to litigation. There will be chaos in the administration of justice.”
Consumer Dispute| Supreme Court explains the scope of maintainability of SLP under Art 136 against NCDRC orders
The Court explained that the power to special leave is an exceptional and overriding power, naturally it must be exercised sparingly and with caution and only in very exceptional situations. It will only be used to advance the cause of justice and its exercise will be governed by well-established principles.
State legislature can’t enact a law that touches the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court; Section 13(2) of the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act held unconstitutional
Supreme Court: The 5-judge bench of Arun Mishra, Indira Banerjee, Vineet Saran, MR Shah and S. Ravindra Bhat, JJ has declared Section
Cauvery Dispute: Sections 6(2) and 11 of Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956 does not bar the jurisdiction of Supreme Court under Article 136
Supreme Court: In the Cauvery Water Dispute where the issue relating to referring the matter to the Tribunal was concerned, the 3-judge
Investigation against Husna and Naseemuddin Siddiqui for holding disproportionate assets to be completed within 6 months
Supreme Court: In the petition praying for implementation of the recommendation/report of the Lokayukta Uttar Pradesh, dated 22nd February, 2012, the Court