Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Uttaranchal High Court: The Division Bench of Sanjaya Kumar Mishra and Ramesh Chandra Khulbe, JJ. allowed appeals filed by the

Cases ReportedSCC Weekly

    Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — S. 31(7) and Ss. 17, 21, 23(3), 24(1), 25, 26, 29 and 85(2)(a) —

OP. ED.Practical Lawyer Archives

by Kumar Bhaskar*

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Abhijnan Jha* and Urvashi Misra**

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Paridhi Jain†

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Dhruv S. Patel†

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Tariq Khan†

Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 76

Madras High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Madras High Court: In an intra-Court appeal filed against the order of the single judge, whereby, the judge allowed the

Case BriefsSupreme Court

    Supreme Court: The Division Bench of Indira Banerjee* and A.S. Bopanna, JJ., contemplated the scope of Section 9 of Arbitration

SCC Part
Cases ReportedSCC Weekly

    Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Ss. 8, 11, 7, 2(1)(h), 16 and 45 — Non-signatory or non-party to arbitration

Case BriefsSupreme Court

When Section 7 or any other provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 do not stipulate any particular form or requirements, it would not be appropriate for a court to gratuitously add impediments and desist from upholding the validity of an arbitration agreement.

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Dr DY Chandrachud*, Surya Kant and Sanjiv Khanna*, JJ  has held that arbitrators do not have

Calcutta High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Calcutta High Court: While deciding a review petition, Debangsu Basak, J. held that the court while exercising powers under Section

SCC Part
Cases ReportedSCC Weekly

    Advocates Act, 1961 — S. 16 — Procedure for designation of Senior Advocates: Clarification of Guidelines prescribed for Supreme Court

Rajasthan High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Rajasthan High Court: Ashok Kumar Gaur, J. found that the writ petition by the petitioner lacks merit and dismissed it

Karnataka High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Karnataka High Court: A Division bench of Ritu Raj Awasthi, CJ., and Suraj Govindaraj, J. issued notice to the respondent and listed

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: Vibhu Bakhru, J., allowed an amendment application seeking amendment of a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: In a case where the bench of Ajay Rastogi and Abhay S. Oka, JJ was deciding an issue relating to

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: The Division Bench of Rajiv Shakdher and Talwant Singh, JJ., while addressing a matter with regard to the arbitral

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: On finding no ground for interference in the arbitral award, Anup Jairam Bhambhani, J., upheld the decision of Single