Madras High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Madras High Court: In an intra-Court appeal filed against the order of the single judge, whereby, the judge allowed the

rgnul
ADR Competition AnnouncementsLaw School News

    The Centre for Alternative Dispute Resolution, RGNUL (CADR) is collaborating with Surana & Surana International Attorneys, headquartered in Chennai, India

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, (‘A&C Act') challenging

Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Punjab and Haryana High Court: While dismissing the appeal preferred by the appellant challenging the order dated 12-12-2018 passed by the Additional

Rajasthan High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Rajasthan High Court: Ashok Kumar Gaur, J. found that the writ petition by the petitioner lacks merit and dismissed it

Calcutta High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Calcutta High Court: Shekhar B. Saraf, J. upheld the award granted by the Arbitral Tribunal holding that the award holder

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Kerala High Court: The Division Bench of P.B. Suresh Kumar and C.S. Sudha, JJ., expressed that, “…compensation payable under Sections 73, 74

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Tariq Khan†
Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 8

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: Explaining the provision of remission under Section 34 (4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the bench of R.

Akaant MittalExperts Corner

by Akaant Kumar Mittal†

Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 1

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Allahabad High Court: Dr Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, J., held that, Section 36 of the 1996 Act makes the arbitral award capable of

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: The Division Bench of Rajiv Shakdher and Talwant Singh, JJ., while addressing a matter with regard to the arbitral

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: On finding no ground for interference in the arbitral award, Anup Jairam Bhambhani, J., upheld the decision of Single

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Hiroo Advani† and Manav Nagpal††
Cite as: 2021 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 73

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Priyal Jain† and Prasann Malviya††

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: The Division Bench of R.F. Nariman and B.R. Gavai, JJ., while addressing a significant and interesting question of law expressed

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: Sanjeev Narula, J., refused to interfere in the interim arbitral award whereby the sole arbitrator had allowed certain claims of

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Jharkhand High Court: The Division Bench comprising of Aparesh Kumar Singh and  Anubha Rawat Choudhary, JJ., heard the instant Commercial Appeal challenging

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: The bench of Indu Malhotra* and Ajay Rastogi, JJ was posed with the question as to whether the period of

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Kerala High Court: The Division Bench of C. T. Ravikumar and K. Haripal, JJ., partly allowed the instant petition filed under Section