rgnul
ADR Competition AnnouncementsLaw School News

    The Centre for Alternative Dispute Resolution, RGNUL (CADR) is collaborating with Surana & Surana International Attorneys, headquartered in Chennai, India

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, (‘A&C Act') challenging

Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Punjab and Haryana High Court: While dismissing the appeal preferred by the appellant challenging the order dated 12-12-2018 passed by the Additional

Rajasthan High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Rajasthan High Court: Ashok Kumar Gaur, J. found that the writ petition by the petitioner lacks merit and dismissed it

Calcutta High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Calcutta High Court: Shekhar B. Saraf, J. upheld the award granted by the Arbitral Tribunal holding that the award holder

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Kerala High Court: The Division Bench of P.B. Suresh Kumar and C.S. Sudha, JJ., expressed that, “…compensation payable under Sections 73, 74

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Tariq Khan†
Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 8

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: Explaining the provision of remission under Section 34 (4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the bench of R.

Akaant MittalExperts Corner

by Akaant Kumar Mittal†

Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 1

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Allahabad High Court: Dr Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, J., held that, Section 36 of the 1996 Act makes the arbitral award capable of

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: The Division Bench of Rajiv Shakdher and Talwant Singh, JJ., while addressing a matter with regard to the arbitral

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: On finding no ground for interference in the arbitral award, Anup Jairam Bhambhani, J., upheld the decision of Single

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Hiroo Advani† and Manav Nagpal††
Cite as: 2021 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 73

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Priyal Jain† and Prasann Malviya††

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: The Division Bench of R.F. Nariman and B.R. Gavai, JJ., while addressing a significant and interesting question of law expressed

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: Sanjeev Narula, J., refused to interfere in the interim arbitral award whereby the sole arbitrator had allowed certain claims of

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Jharkhand High Court: The Division Bench comprising of Aparesh Kumar Singh and  Anubha Rawat Choudhary, JJ., heard the instant Commercial Appeal challenging

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: The bench of Indu Malhotra* and Ajay Rastogi, JJ was posed with the question as to whether the period of

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Kerala High Court: The Division Bench of C. T. Ravikumar and K. Haripal, JJ., partly allowed the instant petition filed under Section

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Kerala High Court: The Division Bench of C.T. Ravikumar and K. Haripal, JJ., partially allowed the instant appeal challenging the correctness of