Condonation of delay rejected due to ‘lackadaisical approach’ of the applicant
Sikkim High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Meenakshi Madan Rai, Acting CJ. dismissed an application for condonation of 115 days’
Condonation of delay
Period of delay is not the criteria while considering application under Section 5 of Limitation Act
Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of G.S. Sistani and Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, JJ., refused to condone a delay of 65
Power under S. 5 of Limitation Act is not to be exercised in a mechanical manner
Himachal Pradesh High Court: A civil petition was decided by a Single Judge Bench comprising of Ajay Mohan Goel, J., wherein the
Application seeking condonation of delay and main proceeding cannot be clubbed together along with adduced evidence under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC
High Court of Jammu and Kashmir: The Bench of Alok Aradhe J. recently addressed a revision petition wherein the petitioner challenged the
30 days limitation period under Section 30 of RDB Act can’t be condoned by Section 5 of Limitation Act
Supreme Court: Deciding the question as to whether Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 can be invoked to condone the prescribed
If the delay is not condonable statutorily, it cannot be condoned taking recourse to Article 142 of the Constitution
Supreme Court: In an appeal preferred under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003, the 3-Judge Bench of Dipak Misra, A.M. Khanwilkar
Appellate Authorities cannot condone delay beyond the limits specified in the statute
Madras High Court: This division bench of S. Manikumar and D. Krishnakumar, JJ held that there can be no order for condonation
Sufficient Cause u/s. 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 is a pure individualistic test
Punjab and Haryana High Court: While examining the legal position regarding the condonation of delay u/s. 5 of Limitation Act, 1963,