Case BriefsSupreme Court

“The IBC, as a prescriptive mechanism, affecting rights of stakeholders who are not necessarily parties to the proceedings, mandates diligence on the part of applicants who are aggrieved by the outcome of their litigation.”

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: In a major development in the Gauri Lankesh murder case, the bench of AM Khanwilkar*, Dinesh Maheshwari and CT Ravikumar,

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“Although furlough can be claimed without a reason, the prisoner does not have an absolute legal right to claim furlough.”

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Framing of any scheme is no function of the Court and is the sole prerogative of the Government.

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“It would be sufficient to describe the limits of the forest by roads, rivers, ridges or other well-known or readily intelligible boundaries for notification Section 4 of the Forest Act…specific details are not required.”

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: Explaining the law relating to vicarious liability of the Directors of a company under Sections 138 and 141 of the

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Under the provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act, the relief of divorce, judicial separation etc. can be between the husband and the wife only and cannot extend to the third party.

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“A testamentary court is not a court of suspicion but that of conscience.”

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: In a case where a Government employee had sought change of date of birth in service records from 04.01.1960 to

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“…the case on hand is fit to be included in the syllabus of a law school as a study material for students to get equipped with the various provisions of the Code relating to execution.”

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Appointment on compassionate ground is a concession and not a right.

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“…the letters dated 21-05-2008 and 08-07-2008 are interdepartmental communication and not any policy decision or circular meant for public. Thus, such interdepartmental communications are not the enforceable orders of the Union or of the Council.”

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Dr. DY Chandrachud*, Vikram Nath and BV Nagarathna, JJ has lucidly laid down the principles governing

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: Stating that readiness and willingness are necessary for the purpose of passing a decree of specific performance, Division Bench of

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Whether the National Green Tribunal has the power to exercise Suo Motu jurisdiction in discharge of its functions under the NGT Act, 2010?

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: The bench of MR Shah* and AS Bopanna, JJ has held that in an appeal/application filed under Section 34 of

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The settlement agreement subsumes the original complaint.

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: In a case where the members of the Lok Adalat, Madhya Pradesh High Court had entered into the merits of

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Dr. DY Chandrachud*, Vikram Nath and BV Nagarathna, JJ has held that a Preliminary Enquiry is

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The compassion shown to Kashmiri Migrants has to be balanced with the expectations of the serving officers to discharge their duties effectively.

Continue reading