Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“A thin line of distinction exists between defamation and public criticism and an onerous task lies with the Courts to maintain this delicate balance between the competing claims and rights.”

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Delhi High Court said that the petitioner had no prima facie right, title, and interest in the allotted units, and a case was not made out to restrain the respondents from creating any third-party interest.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court found the order of the Appellate Court was completely bereft of any findings or reasoning for reducing the maintenance amount, and that the Appellate Court could not have reduced the amount of maintenance once having rejected the Application for stay.

Continue reading
kerala high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“If any part of the offence or even one instance of the overt act is committed in India, the sanction under Section 188 CrPC is not required”

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court emphasised on the settled position that when two views are possible to a case, then the one that is favours the accused must be adopted.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court dismissed an application for granting interim injunction as similarity of name cannot be the sole criteria, especially because it was a mythological character on which admittedly various works, movies and books are already available.

Continue reading
Madras High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Sexual harassment causes considerable harm to women. Harassment undermines women’s workplace authority, reduces them to sexual objects and reinforces sexual stereotypes and inappropriate gender behaviour. It can have deleterious consequences for the mental and physical health of women”.

Continue reading
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court stated that the impugned order under review misunderstood the nature of cut-off marks as immutable rather than subject to change based on eligibility criteria.

Continue reading
Calcutta High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The case relates to the murder of Madan Tamang, the then-president of the All-India Gorkha League (AIGL) in broad daylight at Darjeeling Mall on 21-05-2010.

Continue reading
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“No reasonable person would believe the prosecutrix’s allegations given the circumstances and inconsistencies in her statements.”

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Several members of Aam Aadmi Party including members of various other opposition parties made an audio and video recording of Court proceedings which had been circulated on various social media platforms.

Continue reading
husband's conviction after killing wife in 1990
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The wife was found dead in the house in May, 1990. It was after several attempts for years, that the husband was apprehended on 09-08-2000 nearly ten years after the incident.

Continue reading
Madras High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Madras High Court said that the reason given in the impugned refusal check slip reveals the patriarchal mind set of the registering authority, giving an underlying assumption that an unmarried woman above the age of 18 years cannot give her biological child in adoption.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court stated that mere addition of prefix and/or suffix to the impugned mark is inconsequential, thus, it rejected Dubond Products India’s contention that the use of the word “HYDROBUILD” before “LW” in the impugned marks is sufficient to distinguish from the marks of Pidilite Industries.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court noted Arbitration agreement specifying an even number of arbitrators cannot be a ground to render the arbitration agreement invalid. Appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) petition.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court stated that the Monuments Act, 1960 makes a distinction between a “protected area” and a “protected monument”, and as per the Notification dated 27-01-1999, the “protected monument” is the Vishalgad Fort and not the entire area.

Continue reading
Allahabad High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Allahabad High Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal to decide the Claim Petition afresh.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court held that no previous sanction as contemplated under S. 197 CrPC would be necessary for investigating and filing final report for offences under S. 509 IPC and S. 3 of the SC/ST Atrocities Act, except for the offences punishable under S. 506 IPC.

Continue reading
Trump too small trademark SCOTUS
Case BriefsForeign Courts

In 2016, after watching a Presidential primary debate exchange between then-candidate Donald Trump and Senator Marco Rubio, the respondent sought to federally register the trademark “Trump too small” to use on shirts and hats.

Continue reading
National Company Law Tribunal
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The NCLT ordered the respondents to maintain the status quo regarding existing shareholders and their shareholding.

Continue reading