Chhattisgarh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

In the present case, the woman has clearly stated that she was not aware about her partner’s marriage and his children. Further, the Trial Court as well as the Appellate Court has also stated that the relationship between them, fell under the category of domestic relationship.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Mere fact that the mother may be physically unwell, does not compel her to accept the presence of those who, in her perception, have contributed to her distress. The Court cannot impose on the senior citizen a forced living arrangement against her will, especially when it has been found to be a source of her suffering.

Continue reading
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Once the objections raised by the petitioner is taken into consideration by Permanent Lok Adalat (Public Utility Services), Jind and an equitable jurisdiction is exercised, such view cannot outrightly be said to be perverse, improper or based on misappropriation of law and facts.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

A sensitive approach is required to be acquired by the Courts while dealing with the offences constituting bribery allegations against a public officer as the same minimizes the trust of the public in public servants who are duty bound to protect them.

Continue reading
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Since no protest was made by the petitioner’s former wife regarding petitioner’s second marriage, therefore, the same might have been a mitigating circumstance for the respondent to favourably exercise the empowerment vested in it regarding granting of ex-post sanction.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The question here is not about past wrongs, it is about the present failure to comply with a legally binding order. The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 is explicit on this point, that those in charge of a company during non-compliance are accountable. By holding a directorial position during this period, the petitioner is naturally included in this responsibility.

Continue reading
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Had it been a case that there was any law provision applicable to students for scaling down or reducing of the marks, then it would have been a different situation. However, in the absence of any authority of law, the exercise was conducted by the clerical staff on their own without any guidelines or any rules and regulations.

Continue reading
Jharkhand High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Even if the ticket was not recovered from his person while preparing the inquest report of the deceased, mere filing of the affidavit on behalf of the appellant was sufficient to raise the presumption that the deceased was bona fide passenger.

Continue reading
power of central govt to make provision related to import of goods
Cases ReportedNever Reported Judgments

This report covers the Supreme Court’s Never Reported Judgment, power of Central Government to make provision related to import of goods, dating back to the year 1953.

Continue reading
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

As parens patriae, the Court has the responsibility to safeguard the child’s interests and could not relinquish this duty by placing her welfare in the hands of relatives.

Continue reading
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Despite holding an indefeasible right to become the able recipient of disability pension, there was a financial detriment to the petitioner.

Continue reading
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The power conferred in the High Court under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, is a residuary power and to be exercised only when no alternative remedy is available.

Continue reading
Chhattisgarh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Considering the Rule 4(1)(d)(i) of the Chhattisgarh Ayush Graduate Course Admission Rules, 2023 is ultra vires, the Court directed the State Government to issue necessary instructions with respect to admission in Bachelor of Ayurvedic Medicine and Surgery course in unaided minority institution.

Continue reading
Chhattisgarh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Section 482 of Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (‘BNSS’) deleted the guiding factors which the Courts hearing anticipatory bail applications might have taken into account, such as nature and gravity of accusation, criminal antecedents, and the possibility of the accused to flee from justice.

Continue reading
Jharkhand High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The prosecution case has crumbled like a house of cards. Neither the circumstances have been proved which can lead to a conclusion that the accused was complicit in offence, nor any consistent prosecution version has come which can be relied upon.

Continue reading
Chhattisgarh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The news report alleged that at present, oxygen supply is being made from the oxygen cylinders which are brought from outside. Despite various authorities inspecting the Hospital, no heed is being paid for restarting the closed Oxygen plants.

Continue reading
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

No sufficient reason was mentioned by the petitioner for the delay in filing the written statement and apparently blunt excuse was provided that the representative of the petitioner fell ill and no instructions could be issued to the Advocate.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

In nutshell, when the petitioner could not find his place in selection list, he knocked the doors of the Court alleging mala fide at the hands of respondents, which cannot be permitted.

Continue reading
judicial precedents and res judicata
Cases ReportedNever Reported Judgments

This report covers the Supreme Court’s Never Reported Judgment, on judicial precedents and res judicata, dating back to the year 1954.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

No plausible explanation was provided by the defendants as to why the trade mark ‘AMUL’ was adopted. No written statement was filed on behalf of the defendants. The conduct of the defendants highlighted their mala fide and dishonesty in adopting the same mark, as that of the plaintiffs’.

Continue reading