Supreme Court: In a matter concerning a unique issue regarding the role of Court Managers, who were introduced by the Thirteenth Finance Commission (2010-2015) to improve the efficiency of court management, the objective was to provide administrative support to judges, ultimately leading to enhanced case disposal, the three Judge Bench of BR Gavai*, CJI, Augustine George Masih and K. Vinod Chandran, JJ. issued the following directions:
(i) High Courts to frame or amend rules: All High Courts in the country shall frame or amend the rules concerning the recruitment and conditions of service for Court Managers. They must take the Assam Rules of 2018 as the model and submit them to the respective State Governments for approval within three months from the date of this judgment. The High Courts and State Governments are free to make suitable modifications to accommodate their specific needs.
(ii) State Government approval: Upon receipt of the rules framed or amended by the High Courts, the respective State Governments shall finalize and grant approval within three months.
(iii) Minimum rank/class of Court Managers: The minimum rank/class of Court Managers should be of a Class-II Gazetted Officer, which would apply to their basic pay, allowances, and other service benefits.
(iv) Supervision of Court Managers: Court Managers appointed in the High Courts will work under the directions and supervision of the Registrar General/Registrars of the High Courts. In the case of Court Managers appointed in the District Courts, they shall work under the supervision and control of the Registrars/Superintendents (Head of the Ministerial Staff) of the courts concerned.
(v) Clear delineation of duties: The Rules Committee of the High Courts shall ensure that the duties, functions, and responsibilities of Court Managers do not overlap with those of the Registrars of the High Courts or District Courts.
(vi) Regularisation of existing Court Managers: Court Managers who are already working on a contractual or consolidated pay basis or on an ad hoc basis shall have their services continued and regularized, subject to passing a suitability test, as provided in the rules to be framed by the respective High Courts and approved by the respective State Governments.
(vii) Entitlement to regularisation: Court Managers already working will be entitled to regularisation from the date of their initial appointment. However, they will not be entitled to arrears for the period between their initial appointment and their actual regularisation.
(viii) Timeline for regularisation: The process of regularisation for Court Managers shall commence and be completed within three months from the date of approval of the rules by the respective State Governments.
(ix) Responsibility of officials: The respective Registrar Generals of the High Courts and the Chief Secretaries of the State Governments shall be personally responsible for adhering to the above-mentioned timelines.
Background
The concept of “Court Managers” was first proposed by the Thirteenth Finance Commission (2010-2015). The Commission had recommended the creation of the post of Court Managers with the aim of assisting judges in performing their administrative duties. It was proposed that the Court Managers be appointed at both the District Court/Sessions Court level and the High Court level. The Court further observed that the Commission had estimated and allocated the necessary funds for the remuneration and other expenses that would be incurred by the States for appointing such Court Managers.
After the Report of the Thirteenth Finance Commission, ‘Guidelines for release and utilization of Grant-in-aid for the Improvement in Justice Delivery as recommended by the Thirteenth Finance Commission’ (Guidelines’) came to be issued by the Ministry of Finance which recommended the roles, responsibilities and the qualifications of Court Managers in detail.
Judgment of the Court in the proceedings dated 2-08-2018
In All India Judges’ Association v. Union of India, (2018) 17 SCC 555, wherein the Court, gave directions regarding the necessary constituents of a “Court Complex”. As a part of the discussion of efficient dispensation and the accessibility to justice for the litigants, the role and importance of Court Managers was also discussed. A direction was also given that Court Managers who are already working must be regularized by the State Government as their assistance was found necessary for a proper administrative setup in the courts.
Report of the SNJPC
In its comprehensive report, the SNJPC addressed various aspects of judicial administration, including the role of Court Managers. The SNJPC recognized the crucial importance of professional management in courts to enhance efficiency and reduce the administrative burden on judges. It recommended the appointment of Court Managers to handle non-judicial functions, thereby allowing judges to focus on their core judicial responsibilities. The SNJPC also analyzed the remuneration and employment status of Court Managers in various states, including Telangana, Maharashtra, and Rajasthan, where the Court Managers continued to work either on a consolidated pay or on a contractual basis. The Report acknowledged the Gauhati High Court (Appointment and Conditions of Service of Court Managers for the State of Assam) Rules, 2018, as comprehensive rules that regularized the Court Managers, providing them with pay benefits and an annual increment.
After the recommendations of the Thirteenth Finance Commission, the SNJPC Report, and the judgment of this Court in the present proceedings dated 2-08-2018, it was expected that the High Courts across the country would frame rules for Court Managers and that the State Governments would approve the same. However, upon reviewing the affidavits submitted by the various State Governments and the High Courts, it was observed that some High Courts had finalized the rules for Court Managers, which had been approved by their respective State Governments. In contrast, the rules prepared by some High Courts were still pending approval from the State Governments concerned. Furthermore, a few High Courts had yet to even frame the rules. As a result of these delays and discrepancies, the present batch of IAs, along with the Writ Petition, had been filed before this Court.
The applicant sought directions to bring uniformity and enhancement in the service conditions of Court Managers across India. The applicant had requested a higher pay scale with appropriate allowances as recommended by the Second National Judicial Pay Commission (‘SNJPC’). The applicant also sought recognition of Court Managers as Class I Gazetted Officers, the regularisation of those still on a contractual basis, and the consideration of their past continuous service for pensionary and monetary benefits. Furthermore, the applicant had prayed for directions from the Court that would lead to the framing of uniform rules for career progression and promotions, along with the formulation of a structured duty roster outlining their roles, responsibilities, and delegated authority to ensure efficient judicial administration.
Issue
Whether in light of the Thirteenth Finance Commission, SNJPC Report and the judgment of this Court in the present proceedings dated 2-08-2018, any further direction needs to be issued to various High Courts and State Governments for framing and implementation of rules for the Court Managers.
Analysis and Decision
The Court observed that although the Guidelines had elaborately addressed various aspects concerning the duties of Court Managers, most High Courts had not framed any formal rules and had instead appointed Court Managers only on a contractual or ad hoc basis.
The Court expressed its deep concern, stating that it was pained to note that despite the clear recommendations made by the SNJPC and the specific directions issued by this Court in its judgment dated 2-08-2018 in the present proceedings, many High Courts and State Governments had yet to comply with the mandate to frame rules governing the service conditions, duties, and other aspects of Court Managers.
The Court further observed that, notwithstanding its earlier directions to regularise individuals already working as Court Managers, a significant number of them continued to be employed either on a contractual or ad hoc basis. Not only had the issues of regularisation, allowances, benefits, and career progression remained unaddressed, but it was also brought to the Court’s attention that in some States, authorities had gone so far as to decide to discontinue the services of Court Managers altogether. Certain State Governments have even resolved to abolish the post of Court Managers, citing financial constraints as the reason.
The Court viewed that since it has consistently emphasisd the need for uniformity in the service conditions of judges across the country, it is equally important that the system for providing Court Managers to the courts, designed to enhance the efficiency of the administration of justice should also be implemented uniformly across the nation. The Court stressed that such uniformity is crucial to ensuring consistency and effectiveness in judicial administration throughout India.
The Court observed that it has already emphasised the importance of Court Managers in assisting District Judges with administrative tasks, allowing judges to focus on their core function of adjudicating cases. In light of this, the Court deemed it imperative to reiterate its earlier directions, urging that the rules regarding the service conditions of Court Managers be framed and approved in a time-bound manner to ensure effective implementation and consistency across the judicial system.
After perusing the Assam Rules of 2018, the Court noted that the Rules provide for the regularisation of the services of Court Managers and outline the associated benefits and allowances. The Rules further specify the method of recruitment and the training required for Court Managers. Most importantly, the Court highlighted that the Assam Rules also clearly enumerate the various duties and responsibilities entrusted to the Court Managers, ensuring a structured approach to their role in enhancing the efficiency of judicial administration.
Thus, the Court concluded that the Assam Rules of 2018 clearly outline the role of Court Managers in assisting the Registrar General and the District Judges. Additionally, Schedule-I of the Assam Rules of 2018 provides an in-depth description of the duties and responsibilities of Court Managers. These duties align broadly with the recommendations of the Thirteenth Finance Commission, while also incorporating other tasks as needed by the High Court or the District Courts. In light of this, the Court agreed with the SNJPC Report, which recognized the Assam Rules of 2018 as being comprehensive in their scope.
The Court stated that, as with other services, promotional avenues are necessary for employees who join the base position of “Court Manager.” Stagnation at a particular level would reduce the efficiency of such Court Managers. The availability of promotional opportunities would lead to better performance and enhanced efficiency. Alternatively, the High Courts and State Governments should consider providing a scheme for Assured Career Progression (‘ACP’) within the rules to incentivize the Court Managers’ performance.
The Court further opined that the Assam Rules of 2018 should be considered as a model for other High Courts when framing their own rules. It was emphasised that the High Courts and State Governments could make adjustments and modifications to accommodate any peculiar exigencies specific to their respective jurisdictions.
The Court found that the directions issued in its judgment dated 2-08-2018, regarding the regularisation of the services of the Court Managers already in employment, need to be reiterated. The Court observed that after having rendered their services for many years, if these Court Managers are not made permanent and are dismissed at this stage, it would cause significant hardship to them. The Court also agreed with the submission of the amicus curiae that, in order to separate the unsuitable candidates, a suitability test should be conducted. This would ensure that only those Court Managers who are found to be suitable would continue, while those deemed unsuitable could be discontinued. The Court further stated that rules for this process should be formulated accordingly.
[All India Judges Association v. Union of India, I.A. No. 135045 OF 2023 in Writ Petition (C) No. 1022 of 1989, decided on 16-05-2025]
*Judgment Authored by: Chief Justice of India BR Gavai
Advocates who appeared in this case :
For Petitioner(s): Mr. Siddharth Bhatnagar, Sr. Adv., Amicus Curiae Mr. Ankit Yadav, AOR Ms. Pracheta Kar, Adv. Mr. Aditya Sidhra, Adv. Mr. Nadeem Afroz, Adv. Ms. Shaoni Das, Adv. Mr. S.R.Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sushant Kumar Yadav, Adv. Mr. Prateek Yadav, Adv. Mr. Mangal Prasad, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Lomes, Adv. Mr. Prithvi Yadav, Adv. Mr. Anurag Singh, Adv. Ms. Radha Rajput, Adv. Mr. Dhroov Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Rana Yashvir Singh Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Ankur Yadav, AOR Digitally signed by DEEPAK SINGH Date: 2025.01.29 17:25:19 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified 2 Mr. Akhilesh Kumar Pandey, AOR Mr. Rakesh Dahiya, AOR Mr. A. Venayagam Balan, AOR Mr. Abhijit Sengupta, AOR Mr. Kuheli Mitra, Adv. Mr. Paras Chauhan, Adv. Mr. R.s.mishra, Adv. Mr. Amar Nath Singh, Adv. Ms. Sunita Kumari, Adv. Mr. Pravir Kumar Jain, AOR Mrs. Amita Gupta, AOR
For Respondent(s): Ms. A. Subhashini, AOR Mr. Gopal Jha, AOR Mr. Umesh Kumar Yadav, Adv. Mr. Shreyash Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Karan Bharihoke, AOR Mr. M. A. Chinnasamy, AOR Mr. Shibashish Misra, AOR Mr. Ajay Kumar, AOR Mr. Satish Kumar, AOR Mr. T. V. Ratnam, AOR Mr. Arjun Garg, AOR Ms. Kriti Gupta, Adv. Mr. Apoorv Kurup, AOR Ms. G. Indira, AOR Mr. Anandh Kannan N., AOR Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, AOR Mr. K. R. Sasiprabhu, AOR Mr. Radha Shyam Jena, AOR Mr. Rajesh Srivastava, AOR M/S. Gagrat And Co, AOR M/S. Arputham Aruna And Co, AOR Mrs. Anjani Aiyagari, AOR Dr. Sushil Balwada, AOR Mr. Nandlal Kumar Mishra, Adv. Mr. Srilok Nath Rath, Adv. Ms. Reena Rao, Adv. Mr. M. Veerappa, AOR Mr. Anil Nag, AOR Mr. Kishan Datta, AOR M/S. Corporate Law Group, AOR 3 Mr. K. Ram Kumar, AOR Mr. Pravir Choudhary, AOR Ms. N. Annapoorani, AOR Mr. Anand Prakash Yadav, Adv. Mr. V. K. Sidharthan, AOR Ms. Hemantika Wahi, AOR Mr. Mahesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Akshay Kumar Sharma, Adv. Ms. Devika Khanna, Adv. Mrs. V. D. Khanna, AOR Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, Adv. Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, AOR Mr. Mandaar Mukesh Giri, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain, AOR Mr. Sunil Fernandes, AOR Mr. Guntur Prabhakar, AOR Mr. T. G. Narayanan Nair, AOR Ms. Samyuktha H. Nair, Adv. Mr. Chander Shekhar Ashri, AOR Mr. Ratan Kumar Choudhuri, AOR Ms. A. Sumathi, AOR Mr. Gopal Krishna, Adv. Mr. Gopal Singh, AOR Mr. T. L. Garg, AOR Dr. J. P. Dhanda, AOR Mr. V. N. Raghupathy, AOR Ms. Mythili S, Adv. Mr. Manish K. Bishnoi, AOR Mr. G. Prakash, AOR Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain, AOR Ms. Rashika Swarup, Adv. Mr. Naman Jain, Adv. Mr. Krishnanand Pandeya, AOR Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR Mr. T. V. George, AOR Mr. Gopal Balwant Sathe, AOR 4 Mr. Surya Kant, AOR Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr. Nishant Sharma, Adv. Ms. Adviteeya, Adv. Ms. Meera Mathur, AOR Mr. Alok Kumar, AOR Mrs. Bina Gupta, AOR Mr. R. Sathish, AOR Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma, AOR Mr. Praveen Swarup, AOR Mr. Praveen Swarup, Adv. Mr. Dhirendra Pratap Singh, Adv. Mr. Ajay Singh, Adv. Mr. Manoj Kumar Rajput, Adv. Mr. Dheeraj Singh, Adv. Mr. T. Harish Kumar, AOR Mr. B. D. Sharma, AOR Mr. R. N. Keswani, AOR Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, AOR Ms. Kumud Lata Das, AOR Mr. Harsh Ajay Singh, Adv. Ms. Pooja Rathore, Adv. Mr. Sourabh Suman, Adv. Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, AOR Mr. Ajit Pudussery, AOR Mr. Raj Kumar Mehta, AOR Mrs. Revathy Raghavan, AOR Mr. Rajiv Mehta, AOR Mr. Abhisth Kumar, AOR Mr. Ashok Mathur, AOR Mr. Pradeep Misra, AOR Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, AOR Mr. P. I. Jose, AOR Mr. P. V. Yogeswaran, AOR Mr. K M Nataraj, A.S.G. Mr. Wasim Quadri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sharath Nambiar, Adv. Mr. Nalin Kohli, Adv. Mr. B K Satija, Adv. Mr. T A Khan, Adv. Mr. Raman Yadav, Adv. Mr. Aaditya Shankar Dixit, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR 5 Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. P. Parmeswaran, AOR Mr. Haresh Raichura, AOR Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, AOR Mr. T. Mahipal, AOR Mr. Arun K. Sinha, AOR Mr. P. K. Jain, AOR Ms. S. Janani, AOR Mr. Anil Shrivastav, AOR M/S. Parekh & Co., AOR Mrs. Garima Prashad A.a.g., Sr. Adv. Mrs. Garima Prashad, Aag, U.p, Sr. Adv. Mr. Adarsh Upadhyay, AOR Mr. Shashank Pachauri, Adv. Mr. Parijat Sinha, AOR Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee, AOR Mr. Prashant Kumar, AOR Mr. Kanhaiya Priyadarshi, AOR Ms. Preetika Dwivedi, AOR Mr. Abhishek Mohanty, Adv. Mr. Guntur Pramod Kumar, AOR Ms. Prerna Singh, Adv. Mr. Samarth Krishan Luthra, Adv. Mr. Dhruv Yadav, Adv. Mr. Vinod Sharma, AOR Mr. T. V. Ratnam, AOR Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr. Nishant Sharma, Adv. Ms. Adviteeya, Adv. Mr. Maibam Nabaghanashyam Singh, AOR Mr. Ramesh Babu M. R., AOR Mr. Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad, AOR Mr. Sahil Tagotra, AOR Mr. Sujay Jain, Adv. Mr. Zubin Dash, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Sangal, AOR Mr. Praveen Pathak, Adv. Mr. Manjeet Singh, Adv. Ms. Sushma Sharma, Adv. 6 Ms. Manju Jetley, AOR Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv. Mr. Bharat Bagla, Adv. Mr. Sourav Singh, Adv. Mr. Sameer Abhyankar, AOR Mr. Rahul Kumar, Adv. Mr. Aakash Thakur, Adv. Mr. Aryan Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Shuvodeep Roy, AOR Mr. Deepayan Dutta, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Maninder Acharya, Sr. Adv. Ms. K. Enatoli Sema, AOR Ms. Limayinla Jamir, Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Adv. Ms. Chubalemla Chang, Adv. Mr. Prang Newmai, Adv. Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker, AOR Mrs. Anu K Joy, Adv. Mr. Alim Anvar, Adv. Mr. Santhosh K, Adv. Ms. Nupur Kumar, AOR Mr. Abhimanyu Singh Ga, Adv. Mr. Sarad Kumar Singhania, AOR Mr. Som Raj Choudhury, AOR Mr. Sanjai Kumar Pathak, AOR Mrs. Shashi Pathak, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv. General, Sr. Adv. Mr. Avijit Mani Tripathi, AOR Mr. Shaurya Sahay, Adv. Mr. T.k. Nayak, Adv. Mr. K Rajeev, Adv. Mr. Bijo Mathew Joy, AOR Mr. Atul Kumar, AOR 7 Ms. Sweety Singh, Adv. Ms. Archana Kumari, Adv. Mr. Rahul Pnadey, Adv. Mr. Sudipta Singha Roy, Adv. Ms. Himanshu Raj, Adv. Mr. Harsh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Avdhesh K Singh, Adv. Mr. Amit Gupta, AOR Mr. Kshitij Vaibhav, Adv. Ms. Muskan Nagpal, Adv. Mr. Sunny Choudhary, AOR Ms. Deepanwita Priyanka, AOR Ms. Taruna Ardhendumauli Prasad, AOR Mrs. Pragya Baghel, AOR Mr. Sravan Kumar Karanam, AOR Mr. Aniket Singh, Adv. Mr. Abhiram Bannuri, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Atrey, AOR Dr. Abhishek Atrey, Adv. Ms. Ishita Bist, Adv. Ms. Ambika Atrey, Adv. Ms. Jyoti Verma, Adv. Mr. Navneet Gupta, Adv. Mr. Chanchal Kumar Ganguli, AOR M/S. Plr Chambers And Co., AOR Mr. Purushottam Sharma Tripathi, AOR Mr. Ajay Pal, AOR Mr. K M Nataraj, A.S.G. Mr. Wasim Qadri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Mr. T A Khan, Adv. Mr. Nalin Kohli, Adv. Mr. B K Satija, Adv. Mr. Sharath Nambiar, Adv. Mr. Vinayak Sharma, Adv. Mr. Padmesh Mishra, Adv. Mr. Daya Krishan Sharma, AOR Mr. Rohit Vats, Adv. Mr. Subham Rana, Adv. Mr. Yashdeep, Adv. Mr. Ankit Bhanot, Adv. 8 Mr. P. S. Sudheer, AOR Mr. Ashutosh Dubey, AOR Mr. Ashutosh Dubey, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Chauhan, Adv. Mrs. Rajshri Dubey, Adv. Mr. Amit P Shahi, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Yadav, Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv. Mr. Anirban Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Manish Dhingra, Adv. Mr. Rajendra Anbhule, Adv. Mrs. Sona Khan, Adv. Mr. Sumant Akram Khan, Adv. Mr. Rahul Sethi, Adv. Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, AOR Ms. Sujata Kurdukar, AOR Mr. Vivek Sharma, AOR Mr. Siddharth R. Gupta, Adv. Mr. Mrigank Prabhakar, AOR Mr. Shantanu Sharma, Adv. Mr. Aman Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Sahu, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, AOR Mr. G. N. Reddy, AOR Mr. Malak Manish Bhatt, AOR Mr. Rajan Kumar, Adv. Mr. Shashank Singh, AOR Mr. Mahendra Vikram Singh, Adv. Mr. Vikas Kumar, Adv. Mr. Binod Kumar Thakur, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Adv. Ms. Enakshi Mukhopadhyay Siddhanta, AOR Mr. Ravi Kumar S., Adv. Mr. P.S. Sridhar Raj, Adv. Mr. Vedant Mishra, Adv. Ms. Smita Amratlal Vora, AOR Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, AOR Mr. Amrish Kumar, AOR Mr. Prashant Shukla, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Suyash Srivastava, Adv. 9 Mr. Manish Pandey, Adv. Mr. Giridhar Upadhayay, Adv. Mr. Satyajeet Kumar, AOR Mr. Santosh Krishnan, AOR Mr. Niranjan Sahu, AOR Mr. Shivang Gupta, Adv. Mrs. Garima Prashad A.a.g., Sr. Adv. Mrs. Garima Prashad, Aag, U.p, Sr. Adv. Mr. Adarsh Upadhyay, AOR Mr. Shashank Pachauri, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR Mr. Aravindh S., AOR Mr. Akshay Gupta, Adv. Mr. Aadithya Aravindh, Adv. Mr. Raghvendra Kumar, AOR Mr. Anil Kumar Mishra-i, AOR Mr. Amit Sharma, AOR Ms. Preetika Dwivedi, AOR Mr. Abhishek Mohanty, Adv. Mr. Mahesh Thakur, AOR Mr. Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, AOR Mr. Amit Anand Tiwari, Sr. A.A.G. Mr. Sabarish Subramanian, AOR Ms. Devyani Gupta, Adv. Mr. Saushriya Havelia A, Adv. Mr. Vishnu Unnikrishnan, Adv. Ms. Tanvi Anand, Adv. Mr. Danish Saifi, Adv. Ms. Ankita Sharma, AOR Mr. Arjun D. Singh, Adv. Mr. Venkata Raghuvamsy D., AOR Mr. K M Natraj, A.S.G. Mr. Wasim S Qadri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR Mr. T A Khan, Adv. Mr. B K Satija, Adv. Mr. Sharath Nambiar, Adv. Mr. Rajeeva Ranjan Rajesh, Adv. Mr. Pratyush Srivastava, Adv. Mrs. Kritygya Kait, Adv. 10 Mr. Satish Pandey, AOR Ms. Jay Jaimini Pandey, Adv. Mr. Braj Kishore Mishra, Adv. Mrs. Manmohan Sharma, Adv. Ms. Surajita Pattanaik, Adv. Mr. Abdul Kalam, Adv. Ms. Seema Patnaha, Adv. Ms. Lalita Gupta, Adv. Mr. Akash Saini, Adv. Ms. Vijaylakshami, Adv. Mr. Abhinav Yash Pandey, Adv. Mr. Smarhar Singh, AOR Ms. Shweta Kumari, Adv. Mr. Manoj Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vikas Chopra, Adv. Mr. Chandra Pratap, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, AOR Mr. Pai Amit, AOR Ms. Pankhuri Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Kushal Dube, Adv. Mr. Abhiyudaya Vats, Adv. Mr. Kartikeya Rastogi, DAG Ms. Inderdeep Kaur Raina, Adv. Ms. Ritika Paswal, Adv. Mr. Akshay Girish Ringe, AOR Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Kunal Chatterji, AOR Ms. Maitrayee Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Rohit Bansal, Adv. Ms. Mrinalini Mukherjee, Adv. Mr. Braj Kishore Mishra, AOR Mr. Abhishek Yadav, Adv. Mr. Ajay Kumar Srivastava, Adv. Ms. Mini Kishore, Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta, AOR Ms. Namita Choudhary, AOR Mr. Apoorv Kurup, Sr. Adv. Ms. Nidhi Mittal, AOR Mr. Gurjas Singh Narula, Adv. Ms. Jaya Choudhary, Adv. Ms. Aswathi M.k., AOR 11 Mr. Kumar Anurag Singh, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Shankar Dvivedi, Adv. Mr. Anando Mukherjee, AOR Mr. Shwetank Singh, Adv. Ms. Radhika Gautam, AOR Mr. Sandeep Sudhakar Deshmukh, AOR Mr. Nishant Sharma, Adv. Mr. Savadikar Ankur Shirish, Adv. Mr. Viraj M. Parakh, Adv. Mr. S. Gowthaman, AOR Mr. D. L. Chidananda, AOR Mr. Mr. Lenin Singh Hijam, Adv. Gen, Adv, Adv. Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, AOR Mr. Karun Sharma, Adv. Ms. Anupama Ngangom, Adv. Ms. Rajkumari Divyasana, Adv. Ms. Astha Sharma, AOR Mr. Dilip Annasaheb Taur, AOR Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Dwivedi, AOR Mr. Ahanthem Henry, Adv. Mr. Ahanthem Rohen Singh, Adv. Mr. Mohan Singh, Adv. Mr. Aniket Rajput, Adv. Ms. Khoisnam Nirmala Devi, Adv. Mr. Kumar Mihir, AOR Ms. Asmita Singh, AOR Mr. Abheet Mangleek, Adv. Mr. Tushar Nair, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Anand, Adv. Mr. Punishk Handa, Adv. Mr. Anandh Kannan N., AOR Mr. V. N. Raghupathy, AOR Ms. Mythili S, Adv. Mr. Sumeer Sodhi, AOR Mr. K.M. Natraj, A.S.G. Mr. Neeraj Kr.sharma, Adv. Mr. Kanu Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Vatsal Joshi, Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Verma, Adv. Mr. Piyush Beriwal, Adv. Mr. Harish Pandey, Adv. 12 Mr. Shashwat Parihar, Adv. Mr. Shreekant Neelappa Terdal, AOR Mr. Krishna Kant Dubey, Adv. Mr. Manish Kumar, AOR Mr. Kartikay Aggarwal, Adv. Mr. Divyansh Mishra, Adv. Mr. Guntur Pramod Kumar, AOR Ms. Prerna Singh, Adv. Mr. Samarth Krishan Luthra, Adv. Mr. Dhruv Yadav, Adv.
