Impleading arbitrator in S. 36
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The award debtor’s counsel contended that the bias is an element of fraud, and to adjudicate the allegations of fraud and/or bias, the member concerned of the arbitral tribunal is required to be impleaded in the proceedings under Section 34 and Section 36(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Calcutta High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Calcutta High Court held that a party can resort to the writ jurisdiction only if there involves public law element and not to enforce a contract of personal service, including all matters relating to the service of the employee-confirmation, suspension, transfer, termination, etc.

calcutta high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

While observing that petitioner submitted the option within the specified timeframe and returned the employer’s contribution in good faith, the Calcutta High Court found the petitioner to be a bona fide applicant.

calcutta high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Calcutta High Court held that the petitioners, having failed to satisfy the appointing authority, could not claim a right to appointment.