Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The case pertains to the clean-up and removal of toxic waste from the Union Carbide Factory site in Bhopal, following the catastrophic gas leak disaster that occurred 40 years ago on this date.

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“In most of the cases, we found that the age of the victim/child/girl is between 16 to 18 years and the age of the offender is 19 to 22 years. In our opinion, this is a serious issue and threat to the future of the youth of the country.”

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court criticized the authorities for their prolonged inertia despite prior orders and sanctioned plans.

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

In the instant matter, the State Bar Council of MP issued a communication calling on lawyers in the State to abstain from judicial work in order to protest against the High Court’s scheme mandating the disposal of 25 oldest cases every quarter.

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court added that this directive does not affect ongoing recruitment where examinations have already been conducted.

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The wife was appointed as Assistant Manager in LIC Housing Finance Ltd., and at time the respondent was doing nothing, this was the reason why husband compelled the appellant to leave the job and stay with him.

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“If any social media platform intends to publish the Court proceedings, that will be permissible only in the manner provided by and subject to restrictions and limitations as per Rule 11(b) of Rules of 2021 and not in any other manner.”

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court observed that the effect of the order was limited to 17-09-2024, indicating that the immediate urgency of the issue may be moot, however, recognised the need to address the concern of setting a future precedent.

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The petitioner pointed out that respondents are keeping the elephants in captivity and in process giving inhuman treatment and out of 10 elephants, 2 elephants died and the respondents have concealed this fact from the Court.