Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court noted that the land’s exclusion was based on expert recommendations and legal restrictions, including Regulation 119, which prohibits acquiring land within 45 meters of a railway or highway.

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

If a person is of the view that the compensation has been paid to a wrong person, then the same can be a ground for making reference under Section 64 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation, and Resettlement Act, 2013.

Rajasthan High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The petitioners alleged that the objections were decided without affording them a proper opportunity of hearing, relying solely on a newspaper notice.

calcutta high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Calcutta High Court held that the issuance of a subsequent notification and the notice by the National Highway Authority did not affect the validity of the earlier acquisition.

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Bombay High Court: The Division Bench of S.V. Gangapurwala and Shrikant D. Kulkarni, JJ., expressed that, In a welfare State, statutory authorities

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: Answering an appeal preferred against the judgement of the High Court of Karnataka, the Division Bench of Ranjan Gogoi and