Securities and Exchange Board of India
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

The brief closure of Digwal unit or imposition of monetary penalty, in terms of the NGT Order, did not require any disclosure in terms of regulation 30(4)(i) of the LODR Regulations.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Contemnor who is an Advocate has made scandalous and derogatory allegations against the Judicial Officers, Judges of this Court, Police Officers, etc. Further, it is also clear from the aforesaid that the Contemnor has no respect for the Courts as also the entire judicial system itself.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The petitioner’s approach in the review petition reflects a selective cherry-picking of sentences from the judgment, disregarding the comprehensive analysis of the rival contentions provided throughout. The so-called “errors” highlighted by the petitioner are not, in fact, errors, let alone errors “apparent on the face of the record.”

Continue reading
Calcutta High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The applicants failed to establish fraud or misrepresentation in the earlier proceedings and did not take adequate steps to protect their property rights.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Dream 11 is a fantasy sport league is an online multi-player game where participants draft virtual teams of real players of a professional sport. These virtual drafted teams get points based on the performance of the players in actual games.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court remanded a case back to the Sessions Court to reconsider charges after new video evidence surfaced, challenging allegations of non-consensual relations as a fresh hearing was essential, as the initial framing of charges lacked access to the forensic report.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

As Authorized Representative was duly authorized, the insistence for presence of CEO is not required as the company may be in possession of several vehicles for the purpose of running its business operations and it may not be feasible for the CEO/MD of the company to appear merely for purpose of disposal of traffic challans.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The petitioner faces charges under Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property (PDPP) Act for allegedly damaging public property using fire and explosives. Additionally, charges include various penal code offences related to the tragic death of Head Constable Ratan Lal.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

A person in a position of authority may make difficult decisions that, while harsh, are part of their professional responsibilities. Such actions cannot be deemed incitement or abetment under Section 306 of the IPC without the requisite mens rea indicating intent to cause harm.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The anonymous websites (Defendants 1-60) have been systematically infringing on the intellectual property rights of the plaintiff through unauthorized content distribution. Operating under hidden or forged identities, these sites flagrantly disregard copyright laws, leveraging the internet’s anonymity to evade accountability.

Continue reading
Calcutta High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The petitioner alleged that members of a particular religious community engaged in acts of violence while another community was peacefully observing the festivals. This violence reportedly occurred across multiple districts in West Bengal.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The plaintiff is a national spokesperson of the INC and a dentist by profession, defendant 1 claims herself to be a national spokesperson of the BJP and defendant 2 is an Indian Media conglomerate ‘TV-18’.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court observed that the contempt proceedings against the respondents lacked legal foundation, as they were not parties to the original petitions instituted by the consortium companies.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Both the applicants have been released once on interim bail and during that period no incident has been alleged by the respondent to have occurred wherein the applicants have tried to tamper with evidence or influence witnesses.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The petitioner claimed to be the Prime Minister of a trans-national government of Tamil Eelam and the impact of allowing such a person to intervene in UAPA proceedings, not being a member of the LTTE or an office bearer of the LTTE, is far reaching.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The present suit seeks a permanent injunction against trademark infringement, passing off, and unfair competition arising from the sale of footwear featuring marks that are nearly identical or deceptively similar to the plaintiff’s established N Device and 550 marks.

Continue reading
Justice B V Nagarathna
Know thy Judge

Justice B. V Nagarathna who is currently serving as a Judge of Supreme Court of India, formerly served as a Judge of Karnataka High Court until her elevation to the Supreme Court. Justice Nagarathna is also the potential contender for the first ever woman Chief Justice of India.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court held that the proceedings initiated in terms of the impugned SCNs and their continuance would be futile and impractical. The impugned SCNs are essentially rendered impotent and would serve no practical purpose.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Yahoo Inc.’s investigation revealed that the defendant was producing a mouth freshener under the name “YAAHOO! Mouth Freshener.” that closely resembled the established trademark “YAHOO!”, leading to allegations of trademark infringement and passing off.

Continue reading
Calcutta High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The petitioners are aggrieved by an order dated 05-10-2024, passed by the Special College Council Members of R.G. Kar Medical College and Hospital, alleging that they have been arbitrarily subjected to suspension and expulsion.

Continue reading