Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

A statutory authority when faced with such a challenge would be obligated to prove that it was either impracticable to proceed or it was constricted by factors beyond its control which prevented it from moving with reasonable expedition.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court held that the petitioner should be permitted to terminate her pregnancy because allowing the Petitioner to continue with the pregnancy can impair the mental stability of the Petitioner as she is showing suicidal tendencies.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

These petitioners, who had not even applied under the second scheme cannot be permitted to challenge the same, that too, at a belated stage i.e. after four years of the closure of such scheme.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

It is the case of the petitioner that they have been using the mark “JACK DANIEL’S” since 1895 in respect of alcoholic beverages. The petitioner is the registered proprietor of various trademarks including “JACK DANIEL’S” and other formative parts.

Continue reading
Calcutta High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

It is the obligation and bounded duty of the husband to maintain his wife and children, if he has sufficient means and neglects or refuses to maintain them in case wife is unable to maintain herself and her child.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Special statutes have stringent conditions for grant of bail but they should not become means to detain the accused without there being any possibility of concluding the trial, expeditiously. Merely charging an accused person under the provisions of these special statutes should not become a punishment in itself which violates Article 21.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Mankind Pharma used the mark “MANKIND” since 1986 and holds 78 separate trademark registrations covering a variety of pharmaceutical products. The concern arose when Novakind adopted the name “NOVAKIND” for its pharmaceutical products.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The petitioner has been successful in obtaining employment with the CISF based on his own merit and qualification. In case the petitioner is not allowed to join, subject to the pendency of the criminal case, the petitioner may lose this opportunity for all times to come, and this loss would never be compensated.

Continue reading
Calcutta High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Calcutta High Court: A petition was filed by Essex Development Investments (Mauritius) Limited (award-holder) seeking the execution of an arbitral award amounting

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

There is no reason why an individual who has been duly cleared of any guilt by law should be allowed to be haunted by the remnants of such accusations easily accessible to the public.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

In cases involving Section 376 IPC or the POCSO Act, Courts must exercise caution while quashing FIRs, as these offences impact societal interests. However, Delhi High Court acknowledged the unique circumstances where the petitioner and the prosecutrix, now married with children, had reached a settlement, balancing societal concerns with the realities of the parties’ lives.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Even though the applicant/petitioner is an accused in the serious crime money laundering, this Court believes that he has every right to avail the best medical treatment, and no authority can curtail the Fundament Right provided to him by the Constitution of India.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The appellants are technologically savvy persons who have made use of their educational qualifications to promote terrorism and incite offensive activities against the country. Such cases would have to be dealt with differently than cases involving innocent persons, who may have been pulled into crime without their knowledge.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court directed GNCTD and Delhi Police to tackle rising bomb threat emails targeting Delhi schools and ordered time-bound implementation of action plans, regular mock drills, and appointment of zonal nodal officers to ensure swift and effective responses.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Financial Commissioner has left no stone unturned in examining the entire gamut of facts in great detail, including minute scrutiny of the Administrator’s report, the findings of the JR as also the Inquiry Report of the Crime Branch, this Court does not find that there has been any apparent violation of principles of natural justice.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court directed the Indian Coast Guard to verify the documents of a candidate whose selection was previously canceled due to Aadhaar discrepancies. The court ruled that upon successful verification of his identity and date of birth, the candidate will be reinstated in the next available induction batch, subject to medical clearance and formalities.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The decision follows a settlement between the parties and the withdrawal of civil proceedings.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court cannot overlook that a mere affidavit, lacking the force of a formal order, was relied upon to deny fundamental privileges under OCI status. To proceed on such tenuous grounds, without proper procedural fairness, would set a concerning precedent, one that risks eroding the unique rights granted under the Citizenship Act.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court directed that the Chief Secretary of the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD) personally intervene to ensure the timely and effective compliance of the judgment dated 04-07-2024 which required the implementation of an online registration mechanism for marriages solemnized under Muslim personal law.

Continue reading
UP Court upholds restraint on Canada
Case BriefsDistrict Court

The Court has upheld a restraint against Canada’s Jamp Pharma and associated third parties, preventing them from infringing upon Jubilant Generics Limited’s intellectual property rights and unauthorized use of its confidential product dossier reinforcing the importance of respecting cross-border confidentiality agreements in pharmaceutical manufacturing and distribution.

Continue reading