Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Delhi High Court opined that true justice, and the ends of justice would not be served by quashing the FIR without a trial, but by conducting a trial to fairly ascertain the real culprit, whether it be the accused or the complainant.

Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Cases under Section 153A are on the rise and the onus is on the police/State to ensure that the said provision is not misused by anyone, much less, political parties.

Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Bombay High Court: In a case filed by the mother of a 9-year-old minor boy, seeking quashing of the FIR

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a batch of petitions filed assailing proceedings initiated by the respondent- State under the Prohibition of

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a case filed by Shilpi Chaudhary (‘petitioner’) seeking quashing of FIR, which was registered alleging offences

Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Bombay High Court: In a case filed by Lata (‘petitioner’) daughter of the deceased who committed suicide and left a

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a petition filed by Jaideep Singh (’Petitioner’) for quashing of FIR registered by Shaildendra Singh (‘Respondent

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Orissa High Court: Sashikant Mishra J. allowed the criminal petition and quashed the FIR and the criminal proceeding due to inordinate delay

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Himachal Pradesh High Court: Chander Bhusan Barowalia J. disposed of the petition and quashed the FIR/complaint. The facts of the case are

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Uttaranchal High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of V.K. Bisht, J. allowed a criminal miscellaneous petition filed under Section 482 CrPC

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Rajasthan High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Arun Bhansali J., dismissed a writ petition on the basis of unreasonable and

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench of the Delhi High Court ruled that proceedings under Sections 498-A, 406 read with 34