Period of service completed prior to regularisation, would be counted towards pensionary benefits
Gujarat High Court: A petition filed by the aggrieved under Articles 14, 16 and 226 of the Constitution, for denial of pensionary
Pensionary benefits
Excess payment made to a retired employee can’t be recovered from his pensionary benefits, unless grounds of fraud or misrepresentation are involved
Calcutta High Court: The writ petition was preferred by a primary school teacher, aggrieved that an amount of Rs. 68, 556 was
An employer’s right to recover excess payment from pensionary benefits of employee who has committed no fraud or misrepresentation whatsoever, must be strictly construed
Calcutta High Court: In the present case, where the petitioner was aggrieved due to the impugned Pension Payment Order, 1999 by which
Brother of government servant, if aged 18 years and above at the time of nomination, cannot be construed as ‘family member’ eligible for pensionary benefits
Madras High Court: Dismissing a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution against the order of the District judge denying pensionary