Rapido Misleading ads 5 min auto guarantee Rapido
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

“Rapido had engaged in a practice calculated to mislead consumers by both commission and omission overstating its actual service capability while concealing qualifying conditions for the purpose of promoting its business”.

Uttaranchal High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“As there is no specific allegation that how the advertisement was false and misleading so as to constitute the offence punishable under Sections 3, 4 & 7 of 1954 Act then there was no occasion for the trial court to take the cognizance and summon the petitioners to face trial.”

2024 SCC Vol. 8 Part 1
Cases ReportedSCC Weekly

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — S. 11 — Res judicata — Applicability between co-defendants — Conditions

Changing How India Advertises
Experts CornerKhaitan & Co

by Tanu Banerjee† and Garima Kedia††
Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 53