Op EdsOP. ED.

by Nipun Bhatia†

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Indrajit Mahanty, CJ and Vinit Kumar Mathur, J., direct State to inform them regarding steps

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Kerala High Court: In a historic decision the Division Bench of K.Vinod Chandran and Ziyad Rahman A.A., JJ., held that the sexual

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Sunil†

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: Suresh Kumar Kait, J., reiterated that no party could be permitted to unilaterally appoint an Arbitrator, as the same

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Telangana High Court: G. Sri Devi, J., rejected a bail application on noting the fact that a minor girl was continuously sexually

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Madhya Pradesh High Court: Rajeev Kumar Dubey, J., denied bail to the applicant who was arrested for the offence punishable under Sections

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Swarnendu Chatterjee* and Arushi Bhagotra**

Case BriefsSupreme Court

 Supreme Court: Holding that an award passed by Emergency Arbitrator is enforceable under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, a Division Bench

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Lakshmi Subramaniam Iyer* and Aishwarya Dash**

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Aryan Dhingra†

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Abhishek Goyal†

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Jeevan Ballav Panda† and Satish Padhi††

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: Asha Menon, J., addressed a suit for trade mark infringement, wherein the Court additionally addressed the scope of Section

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Bombay High Court: The Division Bench of R.D. Dhanuka and R.I. Chagla, JJ., addressed a petition revolving around the Right to Education

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Bombay High Court: Manish Pitale, J., while setting aside an impugned order explained the slight difference between principles laid down under Section

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Jharkhand High Court: A Division Bench of Dr Ravi Ranjan, CJ and Sujit Narayan Prasad, J., took suo motu cognizance to monitor

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Punjab and Haryana High Court: Harsimran Singh Sethi, J., held that length of service in the cadre in which the seniority is

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Karnataka High Court: P. S. Dinesh Kumar, J., dismissed the petitions and did not interfere with the impugned order. The facts of

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Manipur High Court: The Division Bench of KH. Nobin Singh and A. Bimol Singh, JJ., issued certain directions in response to a