DelhiHighCourt

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court directed the Indian Coast Guard to verify the documents of a candidate whose selection was previously canceled due to Aadhaar discrepancies. The court ruled that upon successful verification of his identity and date of birth, the candidate will be reinstated in the next available induction batch, subject to medical clearance and formalities.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The decision follows a settlement between the parties and the withdrawal of civil proceedings.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court directed that the Chief Secretary of the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD) personally intervene to ensure the timely and effective compliance of the judgment dated 04-07-2024 which required the implementation of an online registration mechanism for marriages solemnized under Muslim personal law.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Contemnor who is an Advocate has made scandalous and derogatory allegations against the Judicial Officers, Judges of this Court, Police Officers, etc. Further, it is also clear from the aforesaid that the Contemnor has no respect for the Courts as also the entire judicial system itself.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The petitioner’s approach in the review petition reflects a selective cherry-picking of sentences from the judgment, disregarding the comprehensive analysis of the rival contentions provided throughout. The so-called “errors” highlighted by the petitioner are not, in fact, errors, let alone errors “apparent on the face of the record.”

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Dream 11 is a fantasy sport league is an online multi-player game where participants draft virtual teams of real players of a professional sport. These virtual drafted teams get points based on the performance of the players in actual games.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court remanded a case back to the Sessions Court to reconsider charges after new video evidence surfaced, challenging allegations of non-consensual relations as a fresh hearing was essential, as the initial framing of charges lacked access to the forensic report.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

As Authorized Representative was duly authorized, the insistence for presence of CEO is not required as the company may be in possession of several vehicles for the purpose of running its business operations and it may not be feasible for the CEO/MD of the company to appear merely for purpose of disposal of traffic challans.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The petitioner faces charges under Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property (PDPP) Act for allegedly damaging public property using fire and explosives. Additionally, charges include various penal code offences related to the tragic death of Head Constable Ratan Lal.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

A person in a position of authority may make difficult decisions that, while harsh, are part of their professional responsibilities. Such actions cannot be deemed incitement or abetment under Section 306 of the IPC without the requisite mens rea indicating intent to cause harm.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The anonymous websites (Defendants 1-60) have been systematically infringing on the intellectual property rights of the plaintiff through unauthorized content distribution. Operating under hidden or forged identities, these sites flagrantly disregard copyright laws, leveraging the internet’s anonymity to evade accountability.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The plaintiff is a national spokesperson of the INC and a dentist by profession, defendant 1 claims herself to be a national spokesperson of the BJP and defendant 2 is an Indian Media conglomerate ‘TV-18’.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court observed that the contempt proceedings against the respondents lacked legal foundation, as they were not parties to the original petitions instituted by the consortium companies.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Both the applicants have been released once on interim bail and during that period no incident has been alleged by the respondent to have occurred wherein the applicants have tried to tamper with evidence or influence witnesses.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The present suit seeks a permanent injunction against trademark infringement, passing off, and unfair competition arising from the sale of footwear featuring marks that are nearly identical or deceptively similar to the plaintiff’s established N Device and 550 marks.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Yahoo Inc.’s investigation revealed that the defendant was producing a mouth freshener under the name “YAAHOO! Mouth Freshener.” that closely resembled the established trademark “YAHOO!”, leading to allegations of trademark infringement and passing off.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

A complaint was filed by an NRI passenger who booked a business-class ticket with Ethiopian Airlines for a non-stop flight from Nigeria to India and upon landing in Delhi, he discovered that one of his bags, containing important documents and valuables, was missing.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The impugned mark, “DREAM11”, is clearly used as the domain name of the defendant’s website and its logo. The description of the defendant’s platform as contained on its website reveals that its services are identical to those of Sporta Technologies.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Any waiver of a bail condition must not compromise the one most important legal requirement that a prisoner must make himself available for trial and for compliance with a sentence imposed.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Such vacancies should be notified to the members of the Bar, providing every eligible lawyer with an equal opportunity to express interest; failure to do so creates an appearance of opacity in the process, potentially leading to an impression of arbitrariness.