delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court observed that while grave allegations have been made qua the applicant with regard to connivance/conspiring with the promoters and other co-accused, no allegation with regard to his receiving benefits has been made.

layering of companies
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Prerana Priyanshu† and Jishan Dediwal††

financial creditors
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Vikas Mehta†

2023 scc vol. 4 part 2
Cases ReportedSCC Weekly

CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 — R. 54(14)(b) — Family pension: Although Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act entitles widow of a government servant

Karnataka High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

In Lulu v. Coolulu trademark dispute, the Karnataka High Court chided the competent authority for not considering the nuances of the dispute properly, which meant that the impugned order did not show even a semblence of application of mind.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court observed that in absence of any cogent, supervening circumstances necessitating cancellation of bail of the respondent/accused, the Court cannot merely cancel the bail so granted.

Law School NewsMoot Court Announcements

JSS Law College, Autonomous, Mysuru and Surana & Surana, International Attorneys cordially invite you to compete in the 20th Surana & Surana

Madras High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Madras High Court reiterated that wearing “gown” is only optional and not mandatory before any Courts other than the Supreme Court or the High Courts. Thus, it held that the order of the National Company Law Board imposing a dress code for Advocates for appearance before the Tribunal is without authority and hence, illegal.

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Tushar Behl† and Shreshtha Garge††

Indian Perspective
OP. ED.Practical Lawyer Archives

Devna Arora* and Didon Misri**

Calcutta High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Calcutta High Court | Krishna Rao, J., held that under Companies Act, 2013, Civil Courts have jurisdiction to enquire into

Case BriefsSupreme Court

In a matter relating to criminal proceedings against Reliance Industries, SEBI had failed to comply with the Supreme Court’s order directing it to furnish a copy of documents, leading to initiation of contempt proceedings against SEBI.

2022 SCC Vol. 10 Part 2
Cases ReportedSCC Weekly

    Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Ss. 14(1)(a) and 2(1)(e) r/w Ss. 11(5) and 11(6) — Application seeking termination of

Arbitrability of Shareholders
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Yashasvi Jain†

Clean Slate Theory
Akaant MittalExperts Corner

by Akaant Kumar Mittal†
Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 83

Interviews

Interviewed by Vedika Kakkar

Cases ReportedSCC Weekly

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Ss. 7, 8 and 11 — Essential requirements of arbitration agreement: When there is discernible intention

Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Calcutta High Court | While dismissing a writ petition challenging the capacity of Registrar of Companies (ROC) to initiate multiple/

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Kritika Krishnamurthy† and Tapasi Mohapatra††

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: In a case where the appellant challenged the forfeiture of his office of Director for allegedly entering into a contract