Fraud Arbitration LIDW 2025
Events/WebinarsNews

This report delves into the key insights from the LIDW 2025 panel discussion, exploring the nuanced journey of Indian litigants as they navigate the intricacies of fraud in arbitration—from pre-arbitration disputes to post-award chaos, shedding light on the obstacles that hinder both justice and recovery.

Judge Joan Donoghue LIDW 2025
Events/WebinarsNews

“The members of our profession bear a responsibility as stewards of an ecosystem of international dispute settlement to demonstrate in all that we do, individually and collectively, the power of international dispute settlement as a means of promoting reliability in international interactions and advancing shared values.” – Judge Joan Donoghue

Telangana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“We find the conduct of HMDA not only to be in blatant disregard of the law but also evincing desperation to avoid the processes of law by pushing back their obligation to make payment to CEL by filing one vexatious proceeding after another.”

Aditya Birla and Zee arbitration
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

“Zee and Essel undertook to ensure that SNL would fulfil its obligations and assured that the outstanding amount would be paid. To treat the said LOCs as guarantees would amount to adding words which were not written.”

arbitration after full and final settlement
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“The doctrine of Kompetenz-Kompetenz is now firmly embedded in the arbitration jurisprudence in India. This doctrine is based on the principle that an arbitral tribunal is competent to rule on its own jurisdiction including on the issue of existence or validity of an arbitration agreement”

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

RIL has extracted the ‘Migrated Gas’, however, the said extraction/ exploration of the ‘Migrated Gas’ without any ‘explicit and express permission’ cannot be said to have been in ‘most efficient manner for betterment of the Union’, which did not belong to it and which did not entitle them to reaping any profits therefrom.

Jharkhand High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The intention of both the parties where to go for arbitration, is at Ranchi and the proceeding after permission of the High Court was also conducted at Ranchi and in the agreement, the seat is also said to be at Ranchi. Thus, Ranchi court is having jurisdiction.