Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News
Explore the latest cases reported in SCC’s Income Tax Reports (ITR) Volume on Appeal, Refund, Assessment, Revision, Business expenditure, Recovery of Tax, Revision, Capital or Revenue receipt, Search and Seizure, Benami Transactions and much more.
Explore the latest cases reported in HCC’s Goods & Services Tax Reports (GSTR) Volume on Exemption, Offences and Penalties, Limitation, Reassessment, Advance ruling, Customs Broker, Appeal, Foreign trade, export, import and investment and much more.
Explore the latest cases reported in HCC’s Goods & Service Tax Reports (GSTR) Volume on Appeal, Seized goods, Recovery of duty, Assessment, Anti-dumping, Budgetary support scheme, Jurisdiction and much more.
Explore the latest cases reported in SCC’s Income Tax Reports (ITR) Volume on Exemptions, Revision, Deductions, Limitation, Appeal, Reassessment, Legacy Dispute Resolution, Faceless assessment and much more.
Explore the latest cases reported in HCC’s Goods & Service Tax Reports (GSTR) Volume on Exemption, refund, CENVAT Credit, Appeal, Interest, Limitation, unjust enrichment and much more.
“The grant of bail constitutes a discretionary judicial remedy that necessitates a delicate and context-sensitive balancing of competing legal and societal interests.”
Explore the latest cases reported in SCC’s Income Tax Reports (ITR) Volume on Charitable purpose, Exemptions, Revision, Deductions, Search and Seizure, Appeal, Reassessment, Business expenditure, Penalty proceedings and much more.
Holding Asian Paints as ‘victim’ within CrPC, the Court further stated that victim’s right to prefer appeal under Proviso to S. 372 CrPC is not restricted by any other provision of the CrPC.
Explore the latest cases reported in Income Tax Reports (ITR) Volume on Return of Income, Royalty, Exemptions, Investment business, Reassessment, Appeal and much more.
Explore the latest cases reported in SCC’s Income Tax Reports (ITR) Volume on Income tax deductions, Depreciations, Reassessment, Appeal and much more.
“Adopting a sensitive approach is crucial for the Tribunal. It plays a key and vital role in ensuring not only justice to the victim of the motor accident but also to determine just and fair compensation”
“It is true that no case might have been made out for review, and thereby, the time of the Civil Court must have been consumed to decide such an application, but at the same time, the right available to the party cannot be taken away by the Court, as all concerned, including the Court, are governed by the law.”
“Consideration to condone can be made only if there is a reasonable explanation and the condonation cannot be merely because the appellant is a Government body where procedural and bureaucratic delays are well known.”
The absence of any explanation or defense from the convict, coupled with the surrounding circumstances that pointed to his culpability, led the Supreme Court to conclude that the only plausible inference was that the convict had participated in the commission of the crime.
APTEL said that the sufficient cause to be shown by an applicant, for the delay to be condoned, would depend on the facts and circumstances of each case, it would not be justified to apply a uniform criterion to determine whether the cause shown is sufficient to condone the delay in filing the appeal.
Entry 31 of Schedule of Fees prescribed by the NCLT Rules stipulates that the fee for obtaining true certified copies of final orders passed to parties other than the concerned parties under Rule 50 shall be Rs 5 per page. The stipulation of Rupees five per page in Entry 31 excludes “the concerned parties under Rule 50”.
The power conferred in the High Court under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, is a residuary power and to be exercised only when no alternative remedy is available.
The doors of justice cannot selectively be shut to a few and not to others, particularly where the life and liberty of the accused is at stake.
Under Section 21 of NIA Act, appeals are filed against Special Court’s order and thus in view of the powers that are conferred on the Court of Session for exercising the jurisdiction of the Special Court, orders passed by the Court of Session under Section 22(3) shall also be appealable under Section 21.
This will not mean that the appellant cannot prefer a fresh appeal to the commercial court, Visakhapatnam or such Court which has the jurisdiction.