Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The process of issuing and submitting the domicile certificates was delayed due to factors beyond the petitioners’ immediate control, and it is observed that no prejudice has been caused to the respondent-CBSE or any third party due to this delay.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Looking at the punishments awarded to the co-delinquents for same incidents/transactions and acts of connivance and testing the impugned action on the anvil of Article 14 as well as keeping in mind the long and unblemished spell of service of the respondent, save and except, the Single Judge was inclined to convert the punishment from ‘dismissal’ to one of ‘compulsory retirement’.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The relationship between humans and dogs is at times a relationship of compassion and unconditional love. The responsible authorities should endeavour to manage the menace with the same compassion to ensure equilibrium in the living conditions of both, humans and dogs.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

While the impugned orders are elaborate and explicitly cite specific provisions and clauses of the Haj Policy, 2023, which the petitioners were found to be violating, the show cause notices do not refer to any violations of the Haj Policy, 2023, attributable to the petitioners.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Hot Off The PressNews

The case relates to IT Rules Amendment, 2023, when it allowed the government to set up Fact-Check Units (FCUs) to tackle misinformation against it, sparking fears of censorship and a chilling effect on free speech.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

A mother is sought to be prosecuted for delay in reporting of sexual offences on a child by her own husband, despite the fact that the mother herself was allegedly subject to severe abuse, sexual and otherwise, in her matrimonial home.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

It is not necessary for a registered owner of a trademark to proceed against all entities using similar marks in order to proceed against any one of them. There may be a myriad reasons why a proprietor of a registered trademark may refrain from proceeding against entities that it considers are using infringing marks.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The petitioner who is aspiring to join the Indian Air Force as a Pilot, having applied for the said post pursuant to the advertisement issued on 17-05-2023.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The petitioner is seeking right of physical interview in terms of Delhi Prison Rules and must therefore, exercise it in accordance thereof. He cannot, on one hand, seek right to physical interview according to Rule 589 DPR and on the other hand, not abide by the conditions contained therein.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court has denied travel permission to a Sahara-linked director, maintaining Look Out Circular restrictions amidst a critical SFIO investigation. The Court’s decision underscores the ongoing scrutiny of financial ties and the impact on ongoing probes.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court was informed that during the pendency of the present appeal, the Mercykind Pharmaceuticals made significant changes both in its logo and get up of products which are being marketed by it, which would clearly merit consideration afresh by the Single Judge.

Continue reading
Privity of Contract
Case BriefsDistrict Court

Delhi Court dismissed suit filed seeking recovery of money paid for an Australia Tour for 63 people cancelled due to COVID-19 Lockdown citing lack of privity of contract.

Continue reading
Calcutta High Court
Hot Off The PressNews

Calcutta High Court has taken suo motu cognizance of the vandalism at RG Kar Hospital, ordering the State to submit an affidavit with photographic evidence to ensure the crime scene remains intact.

Continue reading
Justice PV Sanjay Kumar
Know thy Judge

Justice PV Sanjay Kumar is a sitting Judge of the Supreme Court of India. He has formerly served as the Chief Justice of Manipur High Court and as Judge of Punjab & Haryana High Court as well as Andhra Pradesh High Court.

Continue reading
Calcutta High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The petitioner, a victim of an acid attack perpetrated by her husband in 2011, was initially awarded ₹7,00,000 as compensation by the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board.

Continue reading
Calcutta High Court
Hot Off The PressNews

A petition was filed by the parents of a 31-year-old junior doctor at RG Kar Medical College Hospital, who was allegedly raped and murdered seeking an investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) under the supervision of a judge claiming an attempt by the college administration to “cover up” the crime.

Continue reading
Justice J B Pardiwala
Know thy Judge

A 4th generation lawyer, Justice Jamshed Burjor Pardiwala assumed office as Judge of the Supreme Court of India on 09-05-2022 and is in line to become the Chief Justice of India in 2028. Justice Pardiwala is expected to serve a two-year and three months term as Chief Justice of India from 03-05-2028 to 11-08-2030.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court has quashed an FIR registered under Sections 376 (rape), 363 (kidnapping), and 6 of the POCSO Act (aggravated penetrative assault). The decision was based on an amicable settlement between the parties, with no costs imposed on either side. This case underscores the court’s recognition of mutually agreed resolutions in certain criminal proceedings.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court emphasized the necessity of adhering to the specific terms and limitations outlined in contractual clauses. This decision underscores the importance of clear contractual provisions and their binding nature on arbitral tribunals, reaffirming that such limitations must be respected and enforced in arbitral awards.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The applicant must have spent considerable resources fighting the suit for the last 20 years and therefore, it would not be appropriate to deprive him of the opportunity to execute the decree obtained in his favour.

Continue reading