Supreme Court: In a contempt petition alleging absence of effective reservation policy for the transgender persons, even after the pronouncement of the National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India, (2014) 5 SCC 438, the three Judge Bench comprising of Dr. DY Chandrachud, CJI, J.B. Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, JJ. sought response from three States and five Union Territories.
In National Legal Services Authority (supra), the Court held and directed the States and Centre to recognise transgender persons as “third gender” for the purpose of safeguarding their rights under Part III of our Constitution and the laws made by Parliament and the State Legislature. The Court also upheld their right to decide their self-identified gender and directed the Centre and State Governments to grant legal recognition of their gender identity such as male, female or as third gender. Further, the Governments were directed to take steps to treat them as ‘Socially and Educationally Backward Classes’ of citizens and extend all kinds of reservation in cases of admission in educational institutions and for public appointments. The present lis arose regarding the said direction.
The Court noted that Aishwarya Bhati, Additional Solicitor General placed a tabulated statement indicating State-wise compliance with regard to the said direction, wherein it was highlighted that three States and five Union Territories namely, Sikkim, Rajasthan, Telangana, UT of Chandigarh, NCT of Delhi, Lakshadweep, Dadar and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu and Ladakh, were yet to file their responses.
Hence, the Court directed the States and Union Territories concerned to file their responses by 31-08-2024.
CASE DETAILS
Citation: 2024 SCC OnLine SC 1742 Appellants : Respondents : |
Advocates who appeared in this case For Petitioner(s): For Respondent(s): |
CORAM :