Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“A consumer going into the market to purchase premium/ultra-premium whisky will not be confused by the word ‘Pride’ in the name of any brand. The mark has to be compared as a whole.”

madras high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

There will be confusion in the market, especially, in the nature of the product being Cookies, sold in the shelves of supermarkets, any ordinary customer looking at the shelf is bound to be deceived. Therefore, the product of ITC Ltd. is deceptively similar to that of Britannia.

allahabad high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The dissolution of partnership is one aspect and its effect on carrying on business by making different arrangements to defeat rights of a registered trade mark owner, is altogether a different thing”

OCTOBER 2023 WEEKLY ROUNDUP
High Court Round UpLegal RoundUp

A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week.

madras high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Madras High Court said that the apprehension of Sangeetha Hotels that the public would be misled into believing that the respondent is nothing but old wine in a new bottle stands prima facie proved.

high court weekly roundup
High Court Round UpLegal RoundUp

A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week.

madras high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Madras High Court has also granted the plaintiff a decree for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from committing passing off of its restaurant business by using deceptively similar trade mark.

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Transliteration is the conversion of a text from one script or alphabet to another, as opposed to translation from one language to another. Shorter Oxford Dictionary 5th Edition defines ‘transliteration' as a noun to mean rendering of letters or characters of one alphabet in those of another.

high courts roundup
High Court Round UpLegal RoundUp

A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts in April 2023

Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The Court held that in every case of trademark infringement, the plaintiff claiming infringement of its registered mark is required to claim relief in the context of specific instances of infringement, relatable to individuals against whom orders can be passed by the Court.”

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a case where application was filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a case where Club Factory was involved in the sale of various unauthorized/ counterfeited products, bearing

competitive exam
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a suit filed by Frankfinn Aviation Services Private Limited (‘plaintiff’) seeking permanent and mandatory injunction restraining

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a suit filed by Oravel Stays Limited doing business as OYO Rooms (plaintiff) is seeking damages

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In an application filed by the plaintiff seeking permission to file rectification/cancellation petition against registrations of Defendant’s

Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Bombay High Court: In a suit filed by Pidilite Industries Limited (plaintiff) seeking ad-interim reliefs against defendants for selling adhesive

Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a suit filed by Super Cassettes Industries Private Limited, seeking permanent injunction restraining infringement, passing off,

Case BriefsHigh Courts

The trademark RAJNIGANDHA has been declared as a well-known mark by this Court and is entitled to a high degree of protection. The impugned mark is visually and structurally deceptively similar to the Plaintiffs’ trademark.

Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a suit filed for injunction by the Plaintiff restraining the Defendant from selling, offering for sale,