Bombay High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Breach of Undertaking to Compensate Wife for Stridhan
The applicant-husband first agreed in Court to compensate the complainant-wife for the stridhan, but backed out later
streedhan
NRJ Series | Hindu widow’s income derived from husband’s estate to which she succeeds, is her own and at her disposal as her stridhan [(1954) 2 SCC 852]
This report covers the Supreme Court’s Never Reported Judgment, on stridhan, dating back to the year 1954.
Position of law vis-a-vis woman being the sole owner of ‘Stridhan’ is consistent and unequivocal: Supreme Court
The Court found that insofar as Section 406, IPC was concerned, no cognizable offence was visible on the face of the record. Furthermore, charges under S. 6 of Dowry Prohibition Act were not made out either, against the appellants
,
Why did ITAT decide to delete the addition of streedhan as ‘unexplained investment’ for the purposes of income assessment? Read to know
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Jaipur: While deciding the instant appeal revolving around the addition of the assessee’s generational streedhan as unexplained