Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court affirmed that Explanation-II of Section 44(1)(b) of the PMLA applies retrospectively

Orissa High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“In dealing with circumstantial evidence, there is always a danger that conjecture or suspicion lingering on mind might take the place of proof and therefore, the Court has to be watchful and ensure that such thing should not take place.”

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Bombay High Court: K.R. Shriram, J., while upholding the decision of the trial court with regard to the acquittal of the accused,

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: In a 2-decade old matter relating to culpability of the accused under Section 201 IPC pertaining to disappearance of evidence